2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of Gray’s Behavioral Inhibition System in clinically anxious and non-anxious children and adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicated that there was a positive significant relation between harm avoidance and state/trait anxiety. This finding is in agreement with those achieved by Jylhä and Isometsa [5], Abolghasemi et al [6], Kimbrel et al [7], Vervoort et al [8], Nyman et al [9], Strelau and Zawadzki [10], Mertol and Alkın [11], and Rapee [12]. Based on Consigner's theory, high harm avoidance is associated with low level of serotonin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results indicated that there was a positive significant relation between harm avoidance and state/trait anxiety. This finding is in agreement with those achieved by Jylhä and Isometsa [5], Abolghasemi et al [6], Kimbrel et al [7], Vervoort et al [8], Nyman et al [9], Strelau and Zawadzki [10], Mertol and Alkın [11], and Rapee [12]. Based on Consigner's theory, high harm avoidance is associated with low level of serotonin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Outcomes of this study revealed that there was a positive significant relationship between reward dependence dimension and state/trait anxiety. Findings of Abolghasemi et al [6] and Vervoort et al [8] also confirmed this outcome. As Cloninger [3] states, in people with high level of reward dependence, the level of norepinephrine is low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, a high degree of conflict and higher BIS sensitivity would be expected to result in heightened anxiety (Corr, 2004). Although the revised RST posits that the FFFS and BIS are separate systems, the separate systems theory has not been strongly supported with psychometric data (Heym, Ferguson, & Lawrence, 2008;Tull, Gratz, Latzman, Kimbrel, & Lejuez, 2010;Vervoort et al, 2010). The most commonly used measures of BIS/BAS sensitivity (such as the BIS/BAS Scales used here; Carver & White, 1994) are derived from the original RST theory, in which the FFFS and the BIS were represented as one construct (i.e., BIS).…”
Section: Reinforcement Sensitivity Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extremely high or low levels of BIS sensitivity are also related to pathologies. An overactive BIS is related to clinical conditions of anxiety (Kimbrel, 2008;Vervoort et al, 2010) and affective disorders (Hundt, Nelson-Gray, Kimbrel, Mitchell, & Kwapil, 2007;Kasch, Rottenberg, Arnow, & Gotlib, 2002;Pinto-Meza et al, 2006;Sportel, Nauta, Hullu, de Jong, & Hartman, 2011), whereas a hypoactive BIS leads to risk proneness and is related to (primary) psychopathy (Corr, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%