2018
DOI: 10.1002/met.1716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of initial‐condition and cloud microphysics to the forecasting of monsoon rainfall in South Asia

Abstract: The objective of this study is to assess the impact of using different initialization techniques and cloud microphysics of a numerical atmospheric model to improve the forecasting of Indian summer monsoon rainfall (ISMR). A total of six intense precipitation events over the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna and Indus River basins were tested to identify the most suitable combination of parameterization and initialization techniques. The global forecast system (GFS)‐based numerical weather prediction (NWP) forecast fie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, the CTL and ZTD mean absolute errors exceed 15 mm for the larger precipitation threshold, showing that both numerical experiments cannot capture the magnitude of severe rainfall (Figure 4). A similar extent of errors for intense precipitation thresholds have also been found in previous studies (e.g., see References [53,65,66]), showing that quantitative precipitation forecasting (QPF) remains a challenge for regional NWP systems due to uncertainties associated with physics parameterizations, primarily microphysics and convection, domain configuration (e.g., resolution and size), and initial conditions [67,68]. The improvement of a model's initial state through data assimilation results in more accurate QPF.…”
Section: Daily Precipitationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…More specifically, the CTL and ZTD mean absolute errors exceed 15 mm for the larger precipitation threshold, showing that both numerical experiments cannot capture the magnitude of severe rainfall (Figure 4). A similar extent of errors for intense precipitation thresholds have also been found in previous studies (e.g., see References [53,65,66]), showing that quantitative precipitation forecasting (QPF) remains a challenge for regional NWP systems due to uncertainties associated with physics parameterizations, primarily microphysics and convection, domain configuration (e.g., resolution and size), and initial conditions [67,68]. The improvement of a model's initial state through data assimilation results in more accurate QPF.…”
Section: Daily Precipitationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The sensitivity of certain parameterization combinations for rainfall simulation has been well-documented by Refs. [16][17][18]. These findings concluded that the primary parameterizations and their combinations determining the simulated rainfall amount and its distribution are microphysics (MP), Cumulus parametrization (CP), and planetary boundary layer (PBL).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To select the most likely optimum parametrization combinations representing the overall best model performance for the rainfall event, we used a multi-criteria decision analysis technique using the relative closeness to the ideal solution proposed by Refs. [17,19,60]. It is called the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Relative closeness Value (RCV).…”
Section: Verification Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations