1989
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(89)85196-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of optimal control to final state specification by a combined continuation and nonlinear programming approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…NPSOL uses a sequential quadratic programming procedure for solving nonlinear optimization problems and is considered to be the most effective method for NLP problems (Gill et al, 1985). The use of nonlinear programming provides a reliable means of obtaining optimal control (Rosen and Luus, 1989).…”
Section: Solution By Nonlinear Programming (Nlp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NPSOL uses a sequential quadratic programming procedure for solving nonlinear optimization problems and is considered to be the most effective method for NLP problems (Gill et al, 1985). The use of nonlinear programming provides a reliable means of obtaining optimal control (Rosen and Luus, 1989).…”
Section: Solution By Nonlinear Programming (Nlp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable tightly constrained optimal control problems to be solved and to examine the sensitivity of the constraints, Rosen and Luus (1989) used homotopic continuation. The goal of this paper is to investigate the use of continuation to enlarge the search region in optimization problems where it is difficult to find a feasible solution, to identify active inequality constraints and then to use these active inequalities as equality constraints to obtain the optimum accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gradient-dependent method based on Pontryagin's maximum principle may have the convergent problem; a good initial estimate is usually relevant to the "nal solution [2]. On the other hand, the major disadvantage of DP is known as the curse of dimensionality which discourages the use of DP on dynamic systems with more than three or four state variables [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%