1984
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(84)90217-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of outflow peaks and flood stages to the selection of dam breach parameters and simulation models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 9 shows the best-fit equation between the peak outflow and the volume of water behind the dam obtained by Pierce et al [27], the expressions of Evans [56] and Singh and Snorrason [57], and the results for Chipembe dam. The last corresponds to the peak flow predicted by the model Iber for n = 0.04 m −1/3 ·s (2674 m 3 /s in section S1), although very similar values were obtained for the tested range of Manning coefficients, as can be seen in Table 1.…”
Section: Comparison With Real Dam Failure Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 9 shows the best-fit equation between the peak outflow and the volume of water behind the dam obtained by Pierce et al [27], the expressions of Evans [56] and Singh and Snorrason [57], and the results for Chipembe dam. The last corresponds to the peak flow predicted by the model Iber for n = 0.04 m −1/3 ·s (2674 m 3 /s in section S1), although very similar values were obtained for the tested range of Manning coefficients, as can be seen in Table 1.…”
Section: Comparison With Real Dam Failure Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This represents around a 10% difference in peak flow with model predictions. The expressions of Singh and Snorrason [57] and Evans [56], which were developed with (Tables 1 and 2). Therefore, in this upper part of the reach, the flood wave travel times show little dependence on the roughness coefficient.…”
Section: Comparison With Real Dam Failure Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They recommended a range for the breach width as a linear function of the dam height (h d ). Similarly, Singh and Snorrason (1984) plotted the breach widths versus dam heights for 20 case studies and stated a range for the breach width as a linear function of h d . MacDonald and Langridge-Monopolis (1984) used 42 case studies and suggested that the breach shape could be trapezoidal or triangular depending on whether the breach has reached the bottom of the dam or not.…”
Section: Review Of Available Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to carry out an embankment failure analysis, the average breach width in the dam is one of the key parameters that should be accurately estimated because it influences the severity of failure and affects the magnitude of the peak discharge. Singh and Snorrason (1984) used DAMBRK and HEC-1 models on 8 hypothetical breached dams and assessed that changes in breach width were more significant for large dams because it produced larger changes (35-87 %) in peak outflow than for smaller reservoirs (6-50 %). The breach shape of an embankment dam is assumed to vary from triangular to trapezoidal as the breach progresses (Wahl 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%