1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.52.2796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of quasielastic (p→,n→) spin-transfer observables to relativistic Dirac effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in Ref. [11], we see that for some polarization transfer observables the exchange contributions become more important at higher energies. In particular, for ( p, p ′ ) scattering, A y and D ℓ ′ s are sensitive to exchange contributions over the entire energy range.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As in Ref. [11], we see that for some polarization transfer observables the exchange contributions become more important at higher energies. In particular, for ( p, p ′ ) scattering, A y and D ℓ ′ s are sensitive to exchange contributions over the entire energy range.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…In recent papers [10,11] we calculated better effective masses and qualitatively analyzed the sensitivity of complete sets of quasielastic ( p, p ′ ) and ( p, n) polarization transfer observables to medium effects, different forms of the πNN vertex, exchange contributions to the nucleon-nucleon (NN) amplitudes, and also spin-orbit distortions. We emphasized that the much-used SVPAT form [12] is limited in that it does not properly address the exchange behavior of the NN amplitudes in the nuclear medium, and does not properly distinguishing between pseudoscalar (PS) and pseudovector (PV) forms of the πNN vertex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Introducing distorted waves for the projectile and ejectile in quasielastic proton-nucleus scattering represents a significant improvement over previous work [2][3][4][5][6][7]25] which utilized the plane-wave impulse approximation. A choice must be made between a full partial-wave expansion or some approximation which retains the essentials of distortion effects.…”
Section: Hadronic Tensor: Distorted-partial-wave Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1], Hillhouse et al studied various aspects of the model in a series of papers [2][3][4][5][6][7], namely, (i) more refined self-consistent calculations of the projectile and ejectile effective masses, (ii) sensitivities of the complete set of spin observables to different five-term parametrizations of the NN interaction, (iii) new meson-exchange parameters for the relativistic NN amplitudes, (iv) medium modifications of the NN interaction and the effect on ( p, p ) and ( p, n) complete sets of spin observables, and (v) the replacement of the ambiguous five-term parametrization ofF by a general Lorentz-invariant representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%