2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12567-021-00400-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of scale resolving aft-body flow simulations to numerical model parameter variations

Abstract: The sensitivity of hybrid RANS-LES methods like Improved Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (IDDES) to numerical model parameter variations related to generic space launch vehicle aft-body flows is investigated. In particular, the changes resulting from the choice of the time-step size, the turbulence model, the fluid modelling, the circumferential grid resolution, the filter length definition, and the data collection period is considered. The results are also compared to experimental and numerical data taken fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to the computations described above, the numerical method was subjected to a validation study based on a similar axisymmetric backward-facing step geometry with centric air jet. A detailed discussion on this work featuring sensitivity studies on numerical model parameters (i. e. time step size, turbulence model, fluid modeling, circumferential grid resolution, filter length definition and the data collection period) is available in Schumann et al (2021b). The definition of the test case was taken from Deprés et al (2004).…”
Section: Iddes Validation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior to the computations described above, the numerical method was subjected to a validation study based on a similar axisymmetric backward-facing step geometry with centric air jet. A detailed discussion on this work featuring sensitivity studies on numerical model parameters (i. e. time step size, turbulence model, fluid modeling, circumferential grid resolution, filter length definition and the data collection period) is available in Schumann et al (2021b). The definition of the test case was taken from Deprés et al (2004).…”
Section: Iddes Validation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data from Weiss et al (2009); Deprés et al (2004) and numerical data from Meliga et al (2009) agree well with the results from the presented computational setup. Details on the validation particularly with regard to the RMS pressure coefficient distribution and PSD of wall pressure fluctuations can be found in Schumann et al (2021b).…”
Section: Iddes Validation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%