2015
DOI: 10.3906/tar-1406-170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of soil evaporation and reference evapotranspirationto climatic variables in South Korea

Abstract: The quantification of evapotranspiration and soil evaporation is crucial for agricultural water management. The FAO-56 Penman-Monteith and E-DiGOR models were used to compute reference evapotranspiration (Eto) and bare soil evaporation, respectively, at 17 meteorological stations of South Korea, from 1980 to 2009. The same soil parameters were assumed for all stations in order to compare actual soil evaporation (Ea) rates jointly dominated by atmospheric evaporative demand and soil water availability, as well … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the two-day measurement conditions, the process did not present significant difference among cycles I, IV and V, in no-tilled soil, and in cycles I, III, V, in conventional tillage, in relation to the other treatments (Table 4). These differences clearly demonstrate the effect of evaporative atmospheric demand on the soil water evaporation (Song et al, 2014;Aydin et al, 2015), since there was no significant difference in soil moisture in no-tillage among the evaluation cycles, except in cycle IV for the soil under conventional tillage (Table 5). Thus, if water is available on the soil surface (Zribi et al, 2015), the meteorological conditions define the potential for evaporation (Balwinder-Singh et al, 2014;Song et al, 2014;Teng et al, 2014;Tran et al, 2016), especially in stage I (Tesfuhuney et al, 2015) as described by Lemon (1956).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, in the two-day measurement conditions, the process did not present significant difference among cycles I, IV and V, in no-tilled soil, and in cycles I, III, V, in conventional tillage, in relation to the other treatments (Table 4). These differences clearly demonstrate the effect of evaporative atmospheric demand on the soil water evaporation (Song et al, 2014;Aydin et al, 2015), since there was no significant difference in soil moisture in no-tillage among the evaluation cycles, except in cycle IV for the soil under conventional tillage (Table 5). Thus, if water is available on the soil surface (Zribi et al, 2015), the meteorological conditions define the potential for evaporation (Balwinder-Singh et al, 2014;Song et al, 2014;Teng et al, 2014;Tran et al, 2016), especially in stage I (Tesfuhuney et al, 2015) as described by Lemon (1956).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Friction velocity was rated as the second most effective variable, whereas the contributions of Monin–Obukhov length and Schmidt number to the response were negligible (Table 1 ). According to Aydin et al ( 2015 ), the sensitivity outcomes may not reflect the site-specific conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study in Burkina Faso under tropical climate, Ndiaye et al (2017) reported that ET ref was most sensitive to changes in solar radiation, followed by maximum air temperature and wind speed. A study in South Korea showed that ET ref was mostly affected by relative humidity in humid subtropical climate conditions (Aydin et al, 2015). Vicente-Serrano et al (2014) reported that relative humidity, wind speed, and maximum air temperature had stronger impacts on ET ref than sunshine duration and minimum air temperature in the Mediterranean climate in Spain.…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2017) reported that ET ref was most sensitive to changes in solar radiation, followed by maximum air temperature and wind speed. A study in South Korea showed that ET ref was mostly affected by relative humidity in humid subtropical climate conditions (Aydin et al., 2015). Vicente‐Serrano et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%