Biological Effects of Magnetic Fields 1969
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-8352-9_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of Some Plant Material to Magnetic Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The repression effect seen by Dunlop and Schmidt (1969) contrasts with the results of Mericle et al (1964), Mho looked at the growth of barley seeds under the influence of magnetic fields. They found initial increases of growth in both shoots and roots.…”
Section: Plantscontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The repression effect seen by Dunlop and Schmidt (1969) contrasts with the results of Mericle et al (1964), Mho looked at the growth of barley seeds under the influence of magnetic fields. They found initial increases of growth in both shoots and roots.…”
Section: Plantscontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…They found initial increases of growth in both shoots and roots. The absolute magnitude was less than that experienced by Dunlop and Schmidt (1969), and the difference from controls decreased with time ( Fig. 8).…”
Section: Plantsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Increasing MF strength from control to 0.384 T increased contents of N, K, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn, Na and Zn, but reduced P and S content. constant environmental condition encountered biologically (Dunlop & Schmidt, 1969), and the physical mechanism of their effects is now becoming understood. Electric or magnetic treatments are assumed to enhance seed vigour by influencing the biochemical processes that involve free radicals, and by stimulating the activity of proteins and enzymes (Jia-Ming, 1988;Kurinobu & Okazaki, 1995;Morar et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, magnetic-treated water significantly contributed to nutrient uptake, assimilation and mobilization, thereby improving plant productivity [19]. On the other hand, magnetic treatment may not influence or even detrimentally impact crop growth or plant physiological characteristics [20]. Hirano et al [21] found that 70 mT magnetic treatments clearly constrained the growth and photosynthesis of Spirulina platensis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%