2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015jg002922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of stream dissolved organic carbon to temperature and discharge: Implications of future climates

Abstract: Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is a significant constituent in aquatic ecosystems with concentrations in streams influenced by both temperature and water flow pathway dynamics associated with changes in discharge (streamflow). We investigated the sensitivity of DOC concentrations in 12 high‐latitude headwater streams to changes in temperature and discharge using a mathematical model. The implications of differences in sensitivities were explored by using downscaled projections of air temperature and discharge … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(171 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, increasing urban area controlled the long‐term trend in DOC. This is a driver that has seldom been accounted for in previous literature, given a focus on rural, headwater, and upland catchments [ Dawson et al , ; McGlynn and McDonnell , ; Temnerud and Bishop , ; Monteith et al , ; Andersson and Nyberg , ; Eimers et al , ; Kirchner , ; Morel et al , ; Graeber et al , ; Gannon et al , ; Winterdahl et al , ], even though point sources from sewage effluents can be responsible for a significant portion of the total load to a catchment [ Eatherall et al , ; Westerhoff and Anning , ; Sickman et al , ; Tian et al , ]. Nonetheless, the impact of sewage effluents and industrial wastewaters on high riverine DOC concentrations has been recognized to deserve further investigation [ Tian et al , ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, increasing urban area controlled the long‐term trend in DOC. This is a driver that has seldom been accounted for in previous literature, given a focus on rural, headwater, and upland catchments [ Dawson et al , ; McGlynn and McDonnell , ; Temnerud and Bishop , ; Monteith et al , ; Andersson and Nyberg , ; Eimers et al , ; Kirchner , ; Morel et al , ; Graeber et al , ; Gannon et al , ; Winterdahl et al , ], even though point sources from sewage effluents can be responsible for a significant portion of the total load to a catchment [ Eatherall et al , ; Westerhoff and Anning , ; Sickman et al , ; Tian et al , ]. Nonetheless, the impact of sewage effluents and industrial wastewaters on high riverine DOC concentrations has been recognized to deserve further investigation [ Tian et al , ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was calibrated with a Monte Carlo approach, where 200,000 parameter sets were drawn from continuous uniform distributions (Table S4). Parameter ranges were based on physical interpretation where applicable ( γ 0 can, e.g., be estimated from stream base flow concentrations as a first‐order approximation) and previous experience [ Winterdahl et al ., , ]. Behavioral parameter sets (i.e., parameter sets that result in satisfactory model performance according to some a priori prerequisite) were identified based on a combination of the E 1 model performance measure [ Legates and McCabe , ] and the Nash‐Sutcliffe efficiency index [ Nash and Sutcliffe , ] comparing model estimates to actual concentrations as well as log‐transformed concentrations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CC BY 4.0 License. contribution can be affected by the vertical distribution of reacting materials (Musolff et al, 2017;Bishop et al, 2004;Seibert et al, 2009;Winterdahl et al, 2016) and the relative volume contribution of source water (soil water vs groundwater below the soil-weathered rock interface) to the stream (Zhi et al, 2019;Radke et al, 2019;Weigand et al, 2017). With the shale bedrock, the groundwater contribution to the stream is relatively small (~7.5%) at Shale Hills.…”
Section: Regulation Of C-q Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%