2016
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2015.4060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of the Balance Error Scoring System and the Sensory Organization Test in the Combat Environment

Abstract: This study evaluated the utility of the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) and the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) as tools for the screening and monitoring of Service members (SMs) with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in a deployed setting during the acute and subacute phases of recovery. Patient records (N = 699) were reviewed for a cohort of SMs who sustained a blast-related mTBI while deployed to Afghanistan and were treated at the Concussion Restoration Care Center (CRCC) at Camp Leatherneck. On initi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first test was the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), which has been used previously to assess static postural stability. [39][40][41][42][43][44][45] As part of this test, subjects were instructed to close their eyes and hold three different stances (double leg, single leg, and tandem) and two different surfaces (firm floor and a foam pad). In the double leg stance, subjects stand straight, feet together (side by side), with hands on their hip.…”
Section: Neurological Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first test was the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), which has been used previously to assess static postural stability. [39][40][41][42][43][44][45] As part of this test, subjects were instructed to close their eyes and hold three different stances (double leg, single leg, and tandem) and two different surfaces (firm floor and a foam pad). In the double leg stance, subjects stand straight, feet together (side by side), with hands on their hip.…”
Section: Neurological Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,13,16,19,53 Although postural sway has traditionally been quantified using force plates, recent advances in wearable technology have yielded portable and accurate instruments that have been validated against the gold standard of force platforms. 34,55 We previously reported that postural sway measures from a single inertial sensor over the lumbar spine were able to better discriminate between those with and without PCS than the standard clinical mBESS error count.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 The precise mechanism underlying this dysfunction is unknown, but impaired integration of vestibular and proprioceptive information is a potential candidate as integration of vestibular and pelvis-to-feet proprioceptive information is necessary to maintain a heading direction. 35,45 It is currently unclear how sensory integration deficitis in persons with chronic mTBI during static postural tasks 46 translate into nonstatic tasks such as gait and turning. Yet, it is possible that difficulty integrating vestibular and proprioceptive information could be associated with the abnormal turning characteristics seen here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%