1972
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.69.8.2189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of the Contact Chemoreceptors of the Blowfly to Vapors

Abstract: Contact chemoreceptors on the mouthparts and legs of the blowfly Phormia regina that normally respond to

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discussion in Hanson and Dethier, 1973;Slifer, 1970). However, the behavioural observations cited by Slifer (1970), the physiological study of Dethier (1972) and now our own results show that such classification on the basis of these morphological distinctions do not always apply. Future studies using implanted electrodes in the wall or the base of the sensilla are likely to reveal more examples of vapor phase sensitivity of typical contact chemoreceptors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Discussion in Hanson and Dethier, 1973;Slifer, 1970). However, the behavioural observations cited by Slifer (1970), the physiological study of Dethier (1972) and now our own results show that such classification on the basis of these morphological distinctions do not always apply. Future studies using implanted electrodes in the wall or the base of the sensilla are likely to reveal more examples of vapor phase sensitivity of typical contact chemoreceptors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Contact chemoreceptors have been shown to be sensitive to vapors in the blowfly, Phormia regina (Dethier, 1972); however, these responses occurred upon stimulation by vapors that could only be characterized as non-physiological (vapors of concentrated acids and nonpolar organic compounds). The question of whether natural stimuli might also elicit such an olfactory response, and thus be of possible use to an animal in its normal activity, remained unanswered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The disadvantages of the technique are the following : (i) the nerve cell activity is recorded only during contact, which means that background activity before and after effects (rebound inhibition) following the removal of the stimulus can not be recorded; (ii) at the beginning of the recording artifacts can block the amplifier and, as a consequence, the first 100 ms or more of the recording may be lost. The first 100 ms of stimulation may contain enough information to trigger an adequate behavioral response (Dethier, 1968); (iii) the stimulating compounds have to be in a water phase, a serious limitation for the study of nonpolar chemicals (Blaney, 1974;Dethier, 1972); and (iv) both electrolytes and non-electrolytes influence the electrical conductivity of the stimulating and recording solution (Wolbarsht, 1958). This may result in a change in the amplitude of the nerve impulses which is a typical criterion for their identification (see examples in Fig.…”
Section: Electrophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dethier [31] also found that chemoreceptors on the mouthparts and legs of the blowfly Phorinia regina that normally respond to aqueous solutions also respond to organic and inorganic acids, and various nonpolar compounds in gaseous state. It is possible that in mosquitoes, the more proximally located medium-sized hairs which do not normally come into contact with the substrate may respond to vapors.…”
Section: Medium-sized Hairsmentioning
confidence: 99%