2012
DOI: 10.3189/2012aog60a073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of the ice-shelf/ocean system to the sub-ice-shelf cavity shape measured by NASA IceBridge in Pine Island Glacier, West Antarctica

Abstract: Two high-resolution (1 km grid) numerical model simulations of the Amundsen Sea, West Antarctica, are used to study the role of the ocean in the mass loss and grounding line retreat of Pine Island Glacier. The first simulation uses BEDMAP bathymetry under the Pine Island ice shelf, and the second simulation uses NASA IceBridge-derived bathymetry. The IceBridge data reveal the existence of a trough from the ice-shelf edge to the grounding line, enabling warm Circumpolar Deep Water to penetrate to the grounding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
164
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
8
164
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that precise estimates of basal melting under floating ice are required and essential for constraining the evolution of glacier dynamics, as a modest increase of 10 % in basal melting rates impacts ice sheet dynamics. To achieve this goal, however, progress is necessary in the modeling of ice-ocean interactions beneath the ice shelves with coupled ice-sheet-ocean-atmosphere models (Schodlok et al, 2012). Finally, our simulations suggest that the acceleration of Pine Island Glacier will continue to propagate inland and its mass loss will continue for decades to come, even if the oceanic conditions return to their state prior to the 1990s and the grounding line position remains stable for a few decades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results show that precise estimates of basal melting under floating ice are required and essential for constraining the evolution of glacier dynamics, as a modest increase of 10 % in basal melting rates impacts ice sheet dynamics. To achieve this goal, however, progress is necessary in the modeling of ice-ocean interactions beneath the ice shelves with coupled ice-sheet-ocean-atmosphere models (Schodlok et al, 2012). Finally, our simulations suggest that the acceleration of Pine Island Glacier will continue to propagate inland and its mass loss will continue for decades to come, even if the oceanic conditions return to their state prior to the 1990s and the grounding line position remains stable for a few decades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Melting rates are kept constant throughout the simulations, while we know that changes in ice shelf cavity will affect their amplitude and spatial distribution (Schodlok et al, 2012). We choose not to change the pattern of basal melting, as we do not know how changes in ice shelf cavity will impact oceanic circulation and basal melting rates, and our results are therefore likely to be conservative estimates of changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accurate knowledge of grounding line positions as well as their evolution in time is therefore critical to understand ice sheet dynamics. Grounding lines are indeed a fundamental control of marine ice sheet stability (van der Veen, 1985;Hindmarsh and Le Meur, 2001), and they also determine the shape of ice-shelf cavities, which affect oceaninduced melting rates (Schodlok et al, 2012). Grounding line dynamics are strongly non-linear, with long episodes of relative stability interrupted by significant retreat, this evolution being controlled, among other factors, by basal topography (Weertman, 1974;Durand et al, 2009b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To constrain the range of ice shelf melt rates, we calculate the ice shelf melt rate with mass conservation as in using the 2008 velocity, ice shelf thickness from BEDMAP-2, and the bathymetry of ASE to find a maximum ice shelf melt rate 10 at 125 m/yr, or 50% larger than the first scenario. In 2007, which was a warm year, the nearby Pine Island Glacier experienced ∌50 % more melt compared to 1992 (Schodlok et al, 2012). Therefore, in the second scenario, we increase the maximum ice shelf melt rate by 50 % to 120 m/yr to represent warm ocean conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%