2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.642535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of the Spatial Distribution of Fixations to Variations in the Type of Task Demand and Its Relation to Visual Entropy

Abstract: Ocular activity is known to be sensitive to variations in mental workload, and recent studies have successfully related the distribution of eye fixations to the mental load. This study aimed to verify the effectiveness of the spatial distribution of fixations as a measure of mental workload and its sensitivity to different types of demands imposed by the task: mental, temporal, and physical. To test the research hypothesis, two experimental studies were run: Experiment 1 evaluated the sensitivity of an index o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physiological differences between the two task conditions suggest that the designed high MWL hemorrhaging condition evoked high MWL. In the hemorrhage case, longer scan path (i.e., dispersed fixations) and higher NNI (i.e., random fixations) during visual exploration have been associated with higher MWL (Maggi & di Nocera, 2021). The significant changes in these metrics may be caused by differences in surgical field visibility under the two conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physiological differences between the two task conditions suggest that the designed high MWL hemorrhaging condition evoked high MWL. In the hemorrhage case, longer scan path (i.e., dispersed fixations) and higher NNI (i.e., random fixations) during visual exploration have been associated with higher MWL (Maggi & di Nocera, 2021). The significant changes in these metrics may be caused by differences in surgical field visibility under the two conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the raw signals were divided into 15 seconds epochs to extract 5 features related to workload: (1) average pupil diameter PD, (2) number of fixations (NF), (3) average fixation time( FT ), (4) scan path length (SSP), and (5) nearest neighbor index (NNI). The following metrics were selected since they have been previously related to mental workload demands 27 . Fifteen seconds was the minimum epoch size to calculate the eye tracker features based on fixations.…”
Section: Eye Tracker Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, the nearest neighbor index was calculated as the ratio of the nearest neighbor distance of fixations d(NN) and the average distance of a randomly distributed set of fixations d(ran). The nearest neighbor distance, d(NN), was calculated by applying equation 3 to the fixations set 27 . d(ran) was calculated by applying 3 to a randomly generated set of fixations.…”
Section: Eye Tracker Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%