2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11009-018-9675-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of the Stability Bound for Ruin Probabilities to Claim Distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposition 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 below give upper bounds for d(p τ , p τ ). The relevant results on stability (continuity) of the infinite horizon ruin probability can be found, for instance, in [13,17] for the Cramer-Lundberg risk process, and for more general risk model in [2,3,9,10]. On the other hand, we are not aware of any continuity inequalities for densities of ruin time.…”
Section: Theorem 22 and The Results Of Section 3 Imply That Under Somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 below give upper bounds for d(p τ , p τ ). The relevant results on stability (continuity) of the infinite horizon ruin probability can be found, for instance, in [13,17] for the Cramer-Lundberg risk process, and for more general risk model in [2,3,9,10]. On the other hand, we are not aware of any continuity inequalities for densities of ruin time.…”
Section: Theorem 22 and The Results Of Section 3 Imply That Under Somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodological option is a simplifying hypothesis, which could generate some bias in the estimates. Despite the fact that the average duration of the 3,917,863 policies is 327 days (with a standard deviation of 110 days), this problem does not compromise the estimates obtained by MCM on annual basis, which, as argued throughout the paper, are strongly stable (Bareche & Cherfaoui, 2019;Gatto, 2020), mitigating eventual problems of this nature. Furthermore, as the process simulation is based on collective risk modeling, the individual policies effect is diluted in the line of business' standard set.…”
Section: The Databasementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The main one is the approach via the Monte Carlo method (MCM), a stochastic simulation that provides an empirical approach to the ruin probability calculation. More recently, Touazi, Benouaret, Aissani and Adjabi (2017) -using a non-parametric approach -, Bareche and Cherfaoui (2019) and Gatto (2020)both using heavy-tail distributions -demonstrated that the estimates obtained by the simulation methods are strongly stable.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta opção metodológica é uma hipótese simplificadora, que poderia gerar algum viés nas estimativas. Entretanto, como o tempo médio de duração das 3.917.863 apólices da base é de 327 dias (com desvio padrão de 110 dias), este problema não compromete as estimativas obtidas por MMC em bases anuais, que, como argumentado ao longo do texto, são fortemente estáveis (Bareche & Cherfaoui, 2019;Gatto, 2020), mitigando eventuais problemas desta natureza. Ademais, como a simulação do processo baseiase em modelagem de risco coletivo, o efeito de apólices individuais está diluído no conjunto padrão do ramo.…”
Section: A Base De Dadosunclassified