2018
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2018.2854650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of Transient Stability Critical Clearing Time

Abstract: Once the critical clearing time of a fault leading to transient instability has been computed, it is desirable to quantify its dependence on system parameters. We derive for a general power system model a new and exact formula for the first order sensitivity of the critical clearing time with respect to any system parameter. The formula is evaluated by integrating variational equations forward in time along the base case faulton trajectory and integrating adjoint variational equations backward in time along th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If uncertainties are not considered in simulations, deterministic simulations might be unable to predict adverse dynamic behavior introduced by variable initial conditions and inputs. At the present time, a variety of tools have been proposed that are capable of handling uncertainties pertaining to fault clearing time (Sharma et al 2018) and initial conditions, such as trajectory sensitivity (Hiskens and Pai 2000), probabilistic collocation (Hockenberry and Lesieutre 2004), semidefinite programming (Choi, Seiler, and Dhople 2017), Lyapunov function families (Vu and Turitsyn 2016), and Taylor polynomials (Villegas Pico, Aliprantis, and Lin 2017). A common problem with these tools is the curse of dimensionality, which could be addressed by proper computational algorithms.…”
Section: Modeling and Simulation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If uncertainties are not considered in simulations, deterministic simulations might be unable to predict adverse dynamic behavior introduced by variable initial conditions and inputs. At the present time, a variety of tools have been proposed that are capable of handling uncertainties pertaining to fault clearing time (Sharma et al 2018) and initial conditions, such as trajectory sensitivity (Hiskens and Pai 2000), probabilistic collocation (Hockenberry and Lesieutre 2004), semidefinite programming (Choi, Seiler, and Dhople 2017), Lyapunov function families (Vu and Turitsyn 2016), and Taylor polynomials (Villegas Pico, Aliprantis, and Lin 2017). A common problem with these tools is the curse of dimensionality, which could be addressed by proper computational algorithms.…”
Section: Modeling and Simulation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, needs to tend to ∞ such that → ( ) for that characterization to be used. An effective approach was proposed in [13] to get a local characterization of ( ( )) at ; that approach will be used here directly. More details about the approach can be found in [13].…”
Section: E Sensitivity Of Stable Manifold Of Type 1 Cuepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, differentiating (13) and evaluating at for a sufficiently large value of using (15), we get,…”
Section: E Sensitivity Of Stable Manifold Of Type 1 Cuepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deterministic approaches are usually designed to predict TS for online application. Conventionally, time‐domain simulation (TDS) [2], and the transient energy function [1522] approaches have been used for dealing with TS issues in a deterministic way. Modern analysis, which is based on the machine learning algorithms and pattern recognition methods, provides more feasibility and flexibility in TS awareness and power system security classification [2325].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%