2002
DOI: 10.1029/2001jd001095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of zenith total delay accuracy to GPS orbit errors and implications for near‐real‐time GPS meteorology

Abstract: [1] Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements have been demonstrated to provide precipitable water vapor (PWV) estimates with a level of accuracy that is comparable to that of radiosondes and microwave radiometers. GPS measurements therefore have the potential to become a significant source of data for operational weather forecasting, provided that PWV (or the intermediate zenith total delay (ZTD)) can be made available in near real-time with a minimum accuracy degradation. Despite the recent decrease in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, the two precise solutions show a difference of 2.6–4.1 mm ZTD (0.4–0.6 kg m −2 PWV) and a standard deviation of 4.2 mm ZTD (0.6 kg m −2 PWV) mainly due to changes in the tropospheric models. The rapid and NRT solutions show a bias of ∼5 and ∼7 mm ZTD (0.8–1.1 kg m −2 PWV), respectively, and a standard deviation of ∼7 and ∼15 mm, respectively, in ZTD (1.1–2.3 kg m −2 PWV) compared to “precise/repro.” These results are consistent with, for example, those of Ge et al [2002] and Pacione and Vespe [2003]. Figure 5 shows the differences between processings at Niamey for the month of August 2006.…”
Section: Gps Ztd and Pwv Retrieval Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average, the two precise solutions show a difference of 2.6–4.1 mm ZTD (0.4–0.6 kg m −2 PWV) and a standard deviation of 4.2 mm ZTD (0.6 kg m −2 PWV) mainly due to changes in the tropospheric models. The rapid and NRT solutions show a bias of ∼5 and ∼7 mm ZTD (0.8–1.1 kg m −2 PWV), respectively, and a standard deviation of ∼7 and ∼15 mm, respectively, in ZTD (1.1–2.3 kg m −2 PWV) compared to “precise/repro.” These results are consistent with, for example, those of Ge et al [2002] and Pacione and Vespe [2003]. Figure 5 shows the differences between processings at Niamey for the month of August 2006.…”
Section: Gps Ztd and Pwv Retrieval Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation error is obtained from the residual of constrained least squares solution as described by Ge et al (2002) and Jin and Park (2005) and references therein. Figure 4 shows PWV estimation error for all sites.…”
Section: Gps Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable order and step size numerical integrator is used which provides the output at 30-second intervals and corresponds to the time interval of the RSO solution. The total tropospheric delay for the IGS ground stations was corrected using the modified Hopfield model (Goad and Goodman, 1974). The NRLMSISE-00 model is used for the atmospheric drag force modelling, with the area-to-mass ratio of the CHAMP satellite given as 0 .…”
Section: P R O C E S S I N G S T R a T E G Y A N D N U M E R I C A L mentioning
confidence: 99%