2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.clpt.2003.11.211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity/reliability of the time-matched baseline subtraction method in assessment of QTc interval prolongation

Abstract: Time‐matched baseline subtraction (TMBS) is one of the recommended methods to assess QT prolongation of drugs. This study evaluates the sensitivity/reliability of TMBS. Individual heart rate corrected QT (QTc) data were obtained from 22 healthy females who had baseline QT on two consecutive days with ≥9 readings over 24h on either day. 1000 re‐sample datasets were generated via randomly selecting individual data series from one of the 2 days as the basis for subtraction. For each dataset, the inter‐day differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because absolute mean difference was not assessed, it is unclear whether a significant increase or decrease in mean values on the second day of observation occurred. Lee et al 2 have described changes from day 1 to day 2 of a lead‐in day as variable and at least as large as within‐day changes but, as with the Kautzner et al report, 1 did not describe the direction of the changes at individual time points. Hollister and Montague 3 evaluated the difference between change from baseline in QTcF (Fridericia correction) at the time of C max following a single oral dose of moxifloxacin when baseline (value obtained immediately predose) and drug administration occurred on the same day and when drug administration occurred on the day after baseline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because absolute mean difference was not assessed, it is unclear whether a significant increase or decrease in mean values on the second day of observation occurred. Lee et al 2 have described changes from day 1 to day 2 of a lead‐in day as variable and at least as large as within‐day changes but, as with the Kautzner et al report, 1 did not describe the direction of the changes at individual time points. Hollister and Montague 3 evaluated the difference between change from baseline in QTcF (Fridericia correction) at the time of C max following a single oral dose of moxifloxacin when baseline (value obtained immediately predose) and drug administration occurred on the same day and when drug administration occurred on the day after baseline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%