2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13202-017-0348-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity study of horizontal length, offset from water oil contact and withdrawal rate of horizontal well in bottom water drive reservoir

Abstract: Estimation of critical rate is required for maximizing oil production from horizontal well before water breakthrough. Post-breakthrough recovery is dependent on parameters viz: Horizontal length (L), withdrawal rate (Q) and offset from WOC (h). Critical rate has been determined using various analytical methods whereas EUR from horizontal well has been calculated for forty-eight cases (L-4 no's, Q-3 no's, h-4 no's) using commercial black oil simulator. Result of the study shows that maximum impact on cumulative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though horizontal well technology is one of the water coning attenuation methods, prediction of water coning (cresting) phenomenon in horizontal wells is a necessity to achieve maximum oil production and/or recovery from the reservoir. To evaluate the potentials of these water coning correlations' predictions in horizontal wells, the basic reservoir and fluid properties data were extracted from the work of Khalili [22] and Kumar et al [25]. These extracted data as presented in Table 1 were used to evaluate the various water coning correlations presented in Tables A1through A3.…”
Section: Horizontal Well Correlations Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though horizontal well technology is one of the water coning attenuation methods, prediction of water coning (cresting) phenomenon in horizontal wells is a necessity to achieve maximum oil production and/or recovery from the reservoir. To evaluate the potentials of these water coning correlations' predictions in horizontal wells, the basic reservoir and fluid properties data were extracted from the work of Khalili [22] and Kumar et al [25]. These extracted data as presented in Table 1 were used to evaluate the various water coning correlations presented in Tables A1through A3.…”
Section: Horizontal Well Correlations Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, proper prediction and planning of this production rate-sensitive phenomenon must be projected and captured in the production scheme to achieve maximum oil production and/or recovery from the reservoir. To evaluate the potentials of the various water coning correlations' prediction in vertical wells, the basic reservoir and fluid properties data were extracted from the work of Khalili [32] and Kumar et al [34]. These extracted data as presented in Table 1 were used to evaluate the various water coning correlations presented in Tables A1 through A3.…”
Section: Water Coning Correlations Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this flow regime comprises both radial and linear flow. The simple assumptions applied in vertical wells (e.g., single permeability or radial symmetry) may not apply to a horizontal well [ 16 , 17 ]. This makes it difficult to estimate the PI of horizontal wells using the model for vertical wells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the reservoir energy drives the fluids toward the well, the radial flow comes from all directions within the formation's thickness [ 1 , 10 ]. There might be an edge [ 5 ] or bottom water [ 17 ] in the aquifer. The linear flow comes from the movement of fluids through a non-changing cross-section, with both ends open to the flow and no fluids crossing the lateral or vertical sides [ 1 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%