Sensitivity to Inflectional Morphemes in the Absence of Meaning: Evidence from a Novel Task

Abstract

A number of studies in different languages have shown that speakers may be sensitive to the presence of inflectional morphology in the absence of verb meaning (Caramazza et al. in Cognition 28(3):297–332, 1988 ; Clahsen in Behav Brain Sci 22(06):991–1013, 1999 ; Post et al. in Cognition 109(1):1–17, 2008 ). In this study, sensitivity to inflectional morphemes was tested in a purposely developed task with English-like nonwords. Native speakers of English were presented with pairs of nonwords and were asked to judge whether the two nonwords in each pair were the same or different. Each pair was composed either of the same nonword repeated twice, or of two slightly different nonwords. The nonwords were created taking advantage of a specific morphophonological property of English, which is that regular inflectional morphemes agree in voicing with the ending of the stem. Using stems ending in /l/, thus, we created: (1) nonwords ending in potential inflectional morphemes, vɔld, (2) nonwords without inflectional morphemes, vɔlt, and (3) a phonological control condition, vɔlb. Our new task endorses some strengths presented in previous work. As in Post et al. ( 2008 ) the task accounts for the importance of phonological cues to morphological processing. In addition, as in Caramazza et al. ( 1988 ) and contrary to Post et al. ( 2008 ), the task never presents bare-stems, making it unlikely that the participants would be aware of the manipulation performed. Our results are in line with Caramazza et al. ( 1988 ), Clahsen ( 1999 ) and Post et al. ( 2008 ), and offer further evidence that morphologically inflected nonwords take longer to be discriminated compared to uninflected nonwords.

The Concept of Intercultural Communication in the Theory of Psycholinguistics

“…This thing happens because people during a conversation are too attentive to what they are going to say to create a good impression. Sometimes we forget about the simplest way to move the feelings of the partner of communicationabout effective listening (Cilibrasi, Stojanovik, Riddell & Saddy, 2019).…”

Reading as a Predictor of Complex Syntax. The Case of Relative Clauses

“…The order of testing was as follows: first, children were assessed with the YARC, followed by the CNRep and the Raven’s matrices. Then, they were assessed with the syntactic task (Adani et al, 2014) and with a morphological task (Cilibrasi et al, 2019) that we do not present in this paper.…”

The Ways of Formation of Future Translators’ Readiness to Perform Professional Activities in the Conditions of War

“…A specialist, for whom the model of professional development is more acceptable, is characterized by the ability to go beyond everyday practice, to understand and to analyze the results of his/her activity as a whole and to direct it in a right direction . The latter largely allows the specialist to design both his/ her own present and the future (Booth, MacWhinney & Harasaki, 2000;Cilibrasi, Stojanovik, Riddell & Saddy, 2019). The person's awareness of his/her potential opportunities, prospects for personal and professional growth prompts him/her to constant experimentation, which is understood as search, creativity, the ability to choose and give advantages (Aleksandrov, Memetova & Stankevich, 2020).…”