1990
DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90094-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitization versus tolerance to haloperidol-induced catalepsy: Multiple determinants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might mean that the D 2 occupancy threshold for the 5-hour EMG response is less than the ‫%07ف‬ reported above and 70%-89% from PET studies. Alternatively, the apparent change in the relationship between occupancy and offset of drug effects may relate to changes in receptor-mediated mechanisms which might involve immediate early gene expression (Robertson and Fibiger 1992) or sensitization to D 2 receptor blockade (Barnes et al 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might mean that the D 2 occupancy threshold for the 5-hour EMG response is less than the ‫%07ف‬ reported above and 70%-89% from PET studies. Alternatively, the apparent change in the relationship between occupancy and offset of drug effects may relate to changes in receptor-mediated mechanisms which might involve immediate early gene expression (Robertson and Fibiger 1992) or sensitization to D 2 receptor blockade (Barnes et al 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might mean that the D 2 occupancy threshold for the 5-hour EMG response is less than the ‫%07ف‬ reported above and 70%-89% from PET studies. Alternatively, the apparent change in the relationship between occupancy and offset of drug effects may relate to changes in receptor-mediated mechanisms which might involve immediate early gene expression (Robertson and Fibiger 1992) or sensitization to D 2 receptor blockade (Barnes et al 1990).No significant increases in EMG activity were ever found with clozapine up to a dose of 40 mg/kg, which far exceeds the range used clinically (Kane et al 1988), and occupied only 54% of striatal and 63% of nigral receptors, values similar to those reported by Sumiyoshi et al (1995) who utilized an in vivo receptor binding technique. In PET studies the low incidence of EPS associated with the use of clozapine has been attributed to its reduced occupancy of striatal D 2 receptors, which ranged from 38%-63%, that is, less than the Ͼ70% occupancy threshold obtained with the typical antipsychotic drugs (Farde and Nördström 1992a;Farde et al 1992b Farde et al , 1992c Nördström et al 1993;Nyberg et al 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, several studies have shown that although tolerance develops when antipsychotics are administered continuously, reverse tolerance (sensitization) is observed when antipsychotics are administered intermittently so that the drug is allowed to wear off between repeated administrations (Ezrin-Waters and Seeman, 1977;Carey and DeVeaugh-Geiss, 1984;Barnes et al, 1990;Csernansky et al, 1990;See and Ellison, 1990;Ahlenius et al, 1991). The few studies that have aimed to assess the importance of antipsychotic treatment schedule on alteration of D 2 -receptor density gave conflicting results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the present study, the increase in cataleptic behavior induced by repeated testing was observed later in mice treated with saline when compared to mice receiving SCH 23390. Interestingly, some studies have reported a repeated testing effect for the catalepsy bar test in haloperidol-treated mice or rats but not in animals receiving saline (Stanley and Glick 1976;Iwata et al 1989;Barnes et al 1990). Thus, one might be led to suspect that a pharmacological component of cataleptic behavior would be able to potentiate a learning component of this behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%