2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensor and biosensor application of a new redox mediator: Rosmarinic acid modified screen-printed carbon electrode for electrochemical determination of NADH and ethanol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…When the literature data are examined, it is understood that the Epa value of LU observed our study was much lower. The reason for the Epa value of LU being observed at a lower potential in this study may be due to electrochemical pretreatment procedure applied to SPCEs [17]. This result is an advantage for using LU as a mediator in the electrochemical analysis of NADH.…”
Section: Electrochemical Behavior Of Lu At Spce/aunpmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the literature data are examined, it is understood that the Epa value of LU observed our study was much lower. The reason for the Epa value of LU being observed at a lower potential in this study may be due to electrochemical pretreatment procedure applied to SPCEs [17]. This result is an advantage for using LU as a mediator in the electrochemical analysis of NADH.…”
Section: Electrochemical Behavior Of Lu At Spce/aunpmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The difference between the anodic and cathodic peak potentials at scan rate of 10 mV.s -1 was calculated as 36 mV. ∆Ep value is close to 30 mV which is reaction mechanism of a reversible twoelectron [17,20,21,25]. Figure 2 (a) shows CVs of 1 mM LU at SPCE/AuNP electrode with different scanning rates.…”
Section: Electrochemical Behavior Of Lu At Spce/aunpmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the linear range, sensitivity and LOD of the developed biosensor were obtained to be 1-29 μM, 0.1025 μA μM À 1 and 0.09 μM respectively. Figure of merits of the developed biosensor were compared with those of the reports and the results were given in Table 1 which reveal comparable and/or better results [37][38][39][40] which suggests it for routine and clinical applications.…”
Section: Figure Of Merits and Analytical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The great limitation of dehydrogenase-based systems in general, and NAD + -dehydrogenase-based systems, in particular, is that, in contrast to oxidases, which have redox cofactors tighly bound to the enzyme, the cofactors are not bound to the enzyme, and it is necessary to add them to perform each determination [1]. In fact, most of dehydrogenase-based biosensors involve the addition of NAD + cofactor to the supporting electrolyte [5][6][7][8][9][10], but it makes the determination time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, new strategies are required for the construction of reagentless dehydrogenase-based electrochemical biosensors in which both, the enzyme and NAD + , are effectively immobilized onto the electrode in such a way that the cofactor has easy acces to the enzyme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%