Proceedings 2001 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.01CH37205)
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2001.958515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensor-assisted video mosaicing for seafloor mapping

Abstract: This paper discusses a proposed processing technique for combining video imagery with auxiliary sensor information. The latter greatly simplifies image processing by reducing complexity of the transformation model. The mosaics produced by this technique are adequate for many applications, in particular habitat mapping. The algorithm is demonstrated through simulations and hardware configuration is described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When surveying in shallow waters or at close range to the seafloor, optical sensors are a preferable alternative to sonar as they can operate at higher resolutions but are limited in range (due to the attention of light), therefore requiring many images to be captured to cover a single site. Most optical underwater surveying approaches use mosaicing methods (Foley et al, 2009;Ludvigsen, Sortland, 626 • Journal of Field Robotics-2017Johnsen, & Singh, 2007Rzhanov, Cutter, & Huff, 2001), to combine many images into a single spatially contiguous two-dimensional (2D) representation of the environment. Mosaics are useful for visualizing data at scales larger than a single image, but most existing approaches in the literature ignore the 3D structure of the scene (for example, (Pizarro & Singh, 2003)), resulting in geometric distortion and inaccuracies in the mosaic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When surveying in shallow waters or at close range to the seafloor, optical sensors are a preferable alternative to sonar as they can operate at higher resolutions but are limited in range (due to the attention of light), therefore requiring many images to be captured to cover a single site. Most optical underwater surveying approaches use mosaicing methods (Foley et al, 2009;Ludvigsen, Sortland, 626 • Journal of Field Robotics-2017Johnsen, & Singh, 2007Rzhanov, Cutter, & Huff, 2001), to combine many images into a single spatially contiguous two-dimensional (2D) representation of the environment. Mosaics are useful for visualizing data at scales larger than a single image, but most existing approaches in the literature ignore the 3D structure of the scene (for example, (Pizarro & Singh, 2003)), resulting in geometric distortion and inaccuracies in the mosaic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most optical underwater surveying approaches use mosaicing methods [4], [5], [6], in which a two-dimensional map is constructed from a set of images. Mosaics are useful for visualising data at scales larger than than a single image, but they are not geometrically accurate since they ignore the 3D structure of the scene [7], resulting in poorly characterised distortions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%