2012
DOI: 10.1145/2240092.2240097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensor network data fault detection with maximum a posteriori selection and bayesian modeling

Abstract: Current sensor networks experience many faults that hamper the ability of scientists to draw significant inferences. We develop a method to systematically identify when these faults occur so that proper corrective action can be taken. We propose an adaptable modular framework that can utilize different modeling methods and approaches to identifying trustworthy sensors. We focus on using hierarchical Bayesian space-time (HBST) modeling to model the phenomenon of interest, and use maximum a posteriors selection … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ni and Pottie [17] design a two-phase modular fault detection framework which includes four modules: blind modeling, trusted sensor selection, model reevaluation, and sensor evaluation. They first use prior knowledge of the phenomenon behavior to determine the parameters of the Hierarchical Bayesian Space Time (HBST) model adopted for sensor data modeling.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ni and Pottie [17] design a two-phase modular fault detection framework which includes four modules: blind modeling, trusted sensor selection, model reevaluation, and sensor evaluation. They first use prior knowledge of the phenomenon behavior to determine the parameters of the Hierarchical Bayesian Space Time (HBST) model adopted for sensor data modeling.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ni and Pottie [48] propose using a hierarchical Bayesian space-time model to detect trustworthy sensors. The disadvantage of this technique is the amount of work required to set up the model.…”
Section: Temporalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it ignores the possible breakdowns in the correlation between neighbouring sensor readings, which may result in wrong validations. Ni [11] proposes Hierarchical Bayesian SpaceTime (HBST) modelling to find faulty data. Compared with linear autoregressive system, this work has a similar detection rate but lower false-positive rate.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validation rule is stated as Eqn. (11), where xi,t denotes a data entry from sensor i at epoch t, and boolj(xi,t) is the verification result from node j.…”
Section: Group Voting Mechanism For Spatial Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%