2020 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 &Amp; IoT 2020
DOI: 10.1109/metroind4.0iot48571.2020.9138286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensor Nodes for Continuous Monitoring of Structures Through Accelerometric Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21, x FOR PROOF16 of 18 to 0.4 g, as it can be appreciated inFigure 12b[1]. In accordance with the explained physics of the problem, the higher amplitude values correspond to low frequencies, while for relatively high frequencies(30-50 Hz range) the lowest amplitude values are observed.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…21, x FOR PROOF16 of 18 to 0.4 g, as it can be appreciated inFigure 12b[1]. In accordance with the explained physics of the problem, the higher amplitude values correspond to low frequencies, while for relatively high frequencies(30-50 Hz range) the lowest amplitude values are observed.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Since a few acquisitions with different input acceleration amplitudes were performed for each tested frequency, the standard uncertainty uc was estimated as the standard deviation for each of these amplitudes. Then, the expanded uncertainty was determined according to (2): In (1), S represents the Discrete Fourier Transform amplitude while i max is the spectrum line corresponding to the maximum amplitude. This equation allows one to take into account, following an energetical interpretation, the energy spread due to leakage on spectrum lines adjacent to the one corresponding to the maximum amplitude detected.…”
Section: Shaker Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations