2008
DOI: 10.2514/1.33493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensor Placement for Damage Detection in Nonlinear Systems Using System Augmentations

Abstract: Currently, most sensor placement methodologies are focused on maximizing the controllability and observability of the monitored structure. Recently, there have been several sensor placement techniques proposed for damage detection. The work herein provides an integrated sensor placement and reduced-order health assessment approach that can be applied to both linear and nonlinear structures. The method uses the idea that damageable regions (hot spots) of the system are often known in advance and, therefore, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Singh and Hahn (17) developed a technique for sensor placement that could be applied to stable nonlinear systems such as binary distillation columns. D'Souza and Epureanu (18) developed an integrated approach for sensor placement and damage detection assessment that can be applied to both linear and nonlinear structures.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Singh and Hahn (17) developed a technique for sensor placement that could be applied to stable nonlinear systems such as binary distillation columns. D'Souza and Epureanu (18) developed an integrated approach for sensor placement and damage detection assessment that can be applied to both linear and nonlinear structures.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methodologies have been applied for solving optimal sensor placement problems. Some commonly used methods include optimality criteria based on the error covariance matrix (19)(20)(21)(22)(23) and observability matrix or Gramian (18,24). Importance has been given to relevant aspects such as measurement cost, sensor failure, redundancy and process information (25)(26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, sensor placement is considered one of the most important pretest steps in experimental/operational modal analysis [1][2][3][4]. Structural health monitoring techniques also incorporate optimal sensor placement (OSP) methodologies for different purposes: system identification, structural damage identification, and finite-element updating [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies of the OSP problem have been conducted using a variety of placement techniques and criteria. Examples include the effective independence method , the effective independence method with driving point residue , the minimization modal assurance criterion (MAC) method , the kinetic energy method , the QR decomposition method , the information entropy‐based method , the damage detection‐based method , and the method minimizing the deviations of measured reduced model from the full model . These approaches focus on the significance of measurement data for structural condition evaluation; the performance of networks is disregarded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%