2015
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2015.2448642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensors Augmentation Influence Over Trust and Reputation Models Realization for Dense Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract: This paper reports the power consumption and resource utilization of a trust and reputation model deployed in a wireless sensor network. The impact of sensor augmentation parameter for static and dynamic wireless sensor network (WSN) with trust and reputation models has been examined. Specifically, we present a novel WSN framework based investigations on peer trust and Linguistic Fuzzy Trust Model (LFTM) for trust and reputation models. Accuracy, path length and energy consumption of sensor node operations are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second scenario, we deployed 20 CoAP nodes in an area of 100 m 2 , denoted as ρ=0.2. These network densities are within the set of densities tested by Singh et al 31 and are denser than the network evaluated by Dao et al 3 The event occurrence follows a Poisson distribution with λ=9, where each event has a fixed duration of 5 min. In addition, the solutions have been tested in three different SR levels with the aim to observe their performance to disseminate low, mid, and highly relevant data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second scenario, we deployed 20 CoAP nodes in an area of 100 m 2 , denoted as ρ=0.2. These network densities are within the set of densities tested by Singh et al 31 and are denser than the network evaluated by Dao et al 3 The event occurrence follows a Poisson distribution with λ=9, where each event has a fixed duration of 5 min. In addition, the solutions have been tested in three different SR levels with the aim to observe their performance to disseminate low, mid, and highly relevant data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, they provided an indepth analysis in maximizing the secrecy performance by examining optimization problems such as optimal jammer selection under identical transmit power and optimal allocation of power in every transmitter with limited transmit power. Singh et al [24] assessed a WSN framework that uses trust and reputation models to quantify and compare performance across multiple WSN modes, such as static, dynamic, and oscillatory.…”
Section: Methods 21 Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new trust and reputation model by adding additional constraints to BTRM-WSN adopting an interactive multiple ant colony algorithm was also suggested in reference [27]. We enhanced the research work reported in references [27][28][29][30] by incorporating rigorous performance parameters on a composite platform for heterogeneous WSNs. Qureshi et al [28] reported an extension of TRM based on interaction and validation along with collusion issue.…”
Section: D) Energy Concernsmentioning
confidence: 97%