2010 International Conference on Power, Control and Embedded Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icpces.2010.5698681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensors integration in embedded systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus is on the input and output interfaces of the components in a unit testing. Pakala et al (2010) designed an approach of integration testing of sensors and actuators via interface communication channel (link) architectures, which uses communicating finite states machine and functional testing. Mattiello-Francisco et al (2012) proposed InRob for the creation of service behavioral models and generation of test data of interoperability and robustness.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The focus is on the input and output interfaces of the components in a unit testing. Pakala et al (2010) designed an approach of integration testing of sensors and actuators via interface communication channel (link) architectures, which uses communicating finite states machine and functional testing. Mattiello-Francisco et al (2012) proposed InRob for the creation of service behavioral models and generation of test data of interoperability and robustness.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, robotic systems are composed of a large number of processes that interact and compete for resources. A concern during the testing activity is the evaluation of the impact of a characteristic on the results Lima and Cavalli (1997); Lee et al (2002); Brito et al (2009); Lu et al (2011); Pakala et al (2010Pakala et al ( , (2011; Damm et al (2011). A defect can origin from exchanging messages among processes and consequently ensure the coverage of several possibilities of communication from topics increases the confidence of correct executions of the system.…”
Section: Fig 1 Communication Types In Rosmentioning
confidence: 99%