2017
DOI: 10.9734/bji/2017/33076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory Analysis of Porridges Processed from Flours of Palmyra New Shoots Enriched with Powders of Moringa oleifera Leaflets and Vigna unguiculata Beans

Abstract: The current study focuses on the sensory properties of fifteen (15) composite porridges processed from flour of new shoots tubers of Borassus aethiopum Mart basis. The composite flours were processed from mixture of various ratios of B. aethiopum flour (BAM) and powders of beans of Vigna unguiculata (VUW) and leaflets of Moringa oleifera (MOL). Sensory analyses were performed Original research Article

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For descriptive sensory analysis data, the homogeneity of means was evaluated by oneway analysis of variance (the nectar formula), using the Statistical Program for Social Sciences software (SPSS 22.0, USA). As for hedonic analysis, khi-square test (X2) for comparison of proportions has been performed [16]. In addition, multivariate principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the STATISTICA version 7.1 software to structure the variability between the nectars and their sensory descriptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For descriptive sensory analysis data, the homogeneity of means was evaluated by oneway analysis of variance (the nectar formula), using the Statistical Program for Social Sciences software (SPSS 22.0, USA). As for hedonic analysis, khi-square test (X2) for comparison of proportions has been performed [16]. In addition, multivariate principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the STATISTICA version 7.1 software to structure the variability between the nectars and their sensory descriptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%