Sensory and demographic characteristics of deafblindness rehabilitation clients in Montréal, Canada

Abstract

The age distribution in this sample of persons with dual sensory impairment indicates that service delivery planning will need to strongly consider the growing presence of older adults as the baby-boomers approach retirement age. The distribution of their visual and auditory limits indicates that the large majority of this client group has residual vision and hearing that can be maximized in the rehabilitation process in order to restore functional abilities and social participation. Future research in this area should identify the specific priorities in both rehabilitation and research in individuals affected with combined vision and hearing loss.

Mental health and dual sensory loss in older adults: a systematic review

“…In a Danish study of DSL rehabilitation clients Dammeyer (2013) found that DSL increased rapidly in those aged 65 years and over. In a similar Canadian study Wittich et al (2012) found that 69% of DSL rehabilitation clients were aged 65 years and over. According to Caban et al (2005) DSL increased from 1.3% for 18 to 44 year olds to 6.6% in those aged 80 years and older.…”

“…Public awareness of DSL is also not widespread and in turn, rehabilitation options have not been well-explored in many countries. Exceptions to this are discussed in papers emerging from the US, Canada and Australia (Heine and Browning, 2002; Saunders and Echt, 2007, 2012; Wittich et al, 2012). …”

The ICF core sets for hearing loss project: International expert survey on functioning and disability of adults with hearing loss using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF)

“…Recent evidence has also however indicated that there is an increasing dual sensory impairment i.e. vision and hearing loss among older adults (Wittich et al, 2012).…”

Effects of a Dual Sensory Loss Protocol on Hearing Aid Outcomes

“…Most DSL patients have residual vision and residual hearing, which can be optimized through rehabilitation (Wittich et al 2012). However, because of the multiplicative effect, the current "unisensory" rehabilitation practice may not be sufficient for DSL patients.…”