2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory and preference testing of selected beef muscles infused with a phosphate and lactate blend

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Support muscles are reported to be more tender than locomotive muscles (Belew et al, 2003). However, with infusion this factor is not relevant, suggesting that the blend tenderised all the muscles to an acceptable level (Hoffman et al, 2008). In this investigation the infused muscles BF (38.90 N), RF (36.06 N) and LL (41.08 N) had significantly lower WBSF values than ST (47.63 N) and SS (47.26 N).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Support muscles are reported to be more tender than locomotive muscles (Belew et al, 2003). However, with infusion this factor is not relevant, suggesting that the blend tenderised all the muscles to an acceptable level (Hoffman et al, 2008). In this investigation the infused muscles BF (38.90 N), RF (36.06 N) and LL (41.08 N) had significantly lower WBSF values than ST (47.63 N) and SS (47.26 N).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Furthermore, McGee et al (2003) stated that lactate injection on pre-cooked beef steaks were significantly different from the controls with no significant differences among injected treatments and NaL improved also juiciness when compared with controls at day 0 of storage as well as having a stabilizing effect throughout the storage periods. Hoffman et al (2008) indicated that lactate-treated and untreated beef muscles did not differ (P > 0.05) with regard to aroma and flavor. Hoffman et al (2008) indicated that lactate-treated and untreated beef muscles did not differ (P > 0.05) with regard to aroma and flavor.…”
Section: Sensory Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Additionally, Papadopoulos et al (1991b) and McGee et al (2003) emphasized that the NaL treatment increased sensory panel tenderness. Hoffman et al (2008) indicated that lactate-treated and untreated beef muscles did not differ (P > 0.05) with regard to aroma and flavor. Although there were no differences (P > 0.05) for initial juiciness, they added that all the treated samples illustrated a higher (P Յ 0.05) degree of sustained juiciness than the untreated sample and the tenderness was enhanced (P Յ 0.05).…”
Section: Sensory Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A study by Hoffman et al (2008) evaluated the effects of injection enhancement with salt and phosphate on 4 different beef muscles. They reported that panelists rated enhanced samples juicier and more tender than non-enhanced samples.…”
Section: Effects On Instrumental Tenderness and Sensory Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%