Handbook of Meat, Poultry and Seafood Quality 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118352434.ch18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory Evaluation of Pork Flavor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Panelists indicated their sensory perceptions of in vivo and in vitro -grown pig fat through a CATA task. An attribute list was generated using 18 common descriptors used in previously published sensory evaluations of meat products and aroma/flavor wheels 4144 . Overall panelist usage of the 18 attributes is shown as a stacked bar plot ( Figure 4A ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Panelists indicated their sensory perceptions of in vivo and in vitro -grown pig fat through a CATA task. An attribute list was generated using 18 common descriptors used in previously published sensory evaluations of meat products and aroma/flavor wheels 4144 . Overall panelist usage of the 18 attributes is shown as a stacked bar plot ( Figure 4A ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meat-like aroma attributes identified by sensory evaluation panelists were largely similar for conventional and cultivated fats, while certain attributes were slightly more prevalent in cultivated fat samples Panelists indicated their sensory perceptions of in vivo and in vitro-grown pig fat through a CATA task. An attribute list was generated using 18 common descriptors used in previously published sensory evaluations of meat products and aroma/flavor wheels [41][42][43][44] . Overall panelist usage of the 18 attributes is shown as a stacked bar plot (Figure 4A).…”
Section: Volatile Chemistry Of Cooked Porcine Fat Was Analyzed Using ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was scored using a modified hedonic measure. The meat was graded on its color, flavor, texture, tenderness, juiciness, and overall acceptability on a nine-point hedonic scale (1 = dislike extremely, 9 = like extremely) (Price;Schweigert, 1971, Válková, 2012.…”
Section: Organoleptic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%