2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0419-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory lesioning induces microglial synapse elimination via ADAM10 and fractalkine signaling

Abstract: Microglia rapidly respond to changes in neural activity and inflammation to regulate synaptic connectivity. The extracellular signals, particularly neuron-derived molecules, that drive these microglial functions at synapses remains a key open question. Here, whisker lesioning, known to dampen cortical activity, induces microglia-mediated synapse elimination. We show that this synapse elimination is dependent on the microglial fractalkine receptor, CX3CR1, but not complement receptor 3, signaling. Further, mice… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
238
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
10
238
0
Order By: Relevance
“…n.s., no significant difference. FNK shedding (Hundhausen et al, 2003) and sensory lesioninduced microglial synapse elimination (Gunner et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…n.s., no significant difference. FNK shedding (Hundhausen et al, 2003) and sensory lesioninduced microglial synapse elimination (Gunner et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microglia are efficient phagocytes of synaptic material and apoptotic cells, which are key processes in the developing brain [19][20][21][22][23] . Specifically, once neuronal circuits are established, microglia contribute to the refinement of synaptic connections by engulfing synaptic elements in early post-natal life, in a fractalkine-and complement cascade-dependent manner [24][25][26][27][28][29] . This refinement is important for behavioral adaptation to the environment 27,[30][31][32][33] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microglia respond to changes in neuronal activity through directed migration of their highly motile processes (Nimmerjahn, Kirchhoff, & Helmchen, ; Wake, Moorhouse, Jinno, Kohsaka, & Nabekura, ). This enables dynamic interaction with synaptic elements, guided for example by purinergic signaling, and the resulting crosstalk between neuron and microglia contributes to experience‐dependent plasticity and the remodeling of brain circuits (Gunner et al, ; Parkhurst et al, ; Rogers et al, ; Schecter et al, ; Sipe et al, ). A further source of controversy related to the role of NMDARs in microglia comes from studies demonstrating that unlike their now prototypic, rapid chemotactic response to released purines, the motility of microglia is not influenced by exogenously supplied glutamate, at least not acutely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%