2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory Processing of Art as a Unique Window into Cognitive Mechanisms: Evidence from Behavioral Experiments and fMRI Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we found that subjective judgments of ugliness and negative emotions both activated the right IFG (RIFG), which is consistent with a recent finding that ugly pictures activated the IFG (Pöppel et al, 2013). The RIFG plays an important role in attentional control and rapidly adaptations to respond to currently relevant and salient stimuli with inhibitory control (Hampshire et al, 2010).…”
Section: Responsesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, we found that subjective judgments of ugliness and negative emotions both activated the right IFG (RIFG), which is consistent with a recent finding that ugly pictures activated the IFG (Pöppel et al, 2013). The RIFG plays an important role in attentional control and rapidly adaptations to respond to currently relevant and salient stimuli with inhibitory control (Hampshire et al, 2010).…”
Section: Responsesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Research in the past has shown that by using stimuli from the arts, i.e., from music, poetry or visual arts, one can obtain new insight into cognitive mechanisms which may remain undetected if one focuses only on simple stimulus configurations as have been employed in the tradition of classical psychophysics (e.g., from our own research environment: Silveira et al, 2012 ; Avram et al, 2013 ; Lutz et al, 2013 ; Pöppel et al, 2013 ; Zaytseva et al, 2014 ; Park et al, 2015 ). With the study reported here, we want to further contribute to this research paradigm by comparing the appreciation of art in subjects from the East and the West with its challenging differences ( Pöppel and Bao, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artists, he claimed, are particularly good at observing their sensuous impressions (data of sensation) and at figuring out which patterns trigger which interpretations. Although many visual scientists have given up Helmholtz’s theory of vision, the idea that artists test and explore the visual system has not really been abandoned (Pöppel et al, 2013). On the contrary, it allows for a more detailed and discriminating version of the same idea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%