2008
DOI: 10.1021/bk-2008-0979.ch033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory Properties of Neotame: Comparison with Other Sweeteners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its sweetness potency is approximately 385- to 650-fold higher than sucrose (table sugar) by weight, depending upon the specific food or beverage application (DuBois et al, 1991; Schiffman and Gatlin, 1993; Schiffman et al, 2008). In 1991, sucralose was first approved for use in Canada, followed by Australia in 1993, and New Zealand in 1996 (Davies, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its sweetness potency is approximately 385- to 650-fold higher than sucrose (table sugar) by weight, depending upon the specific food or beverage application (DuBois et al, 1991; Schiffman and Gatlin, 1993; Schiffman et al, 2008). In 1991, sucralose was first approved for use in Canada, followed by Australia in 1993, and New Zealand in 1996 (Davies, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know that there is some evidence from the sweetness adaptation studies of Schiffman and others (2008) that some of these HPSs bind to different sites of the T1R2/T1R3 heterodimer; sweeteners that bind to the same receptor of the heterodimer adapt, and the ones that bind to different ones do not. Complementary evidence comes from the work of Ennis (1991) who showed that agonists that bind to independent receptor–transducers are synergistic, and the ones that bind to the same ones are not.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DuBois and others (1990) reported the sweetness intensity responses of a large number of high potency sweeteners (HPSs). The results of that work have been reprinted partially many times in a variety of forms (for example, Schiffman and others 2008), and the sweetness intensity–concentration relationships reported therein are still the basis of most other research as well as consumer product development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross adaptation: The phenomenon of adaptation to a sweetener resulting in the subsequent decreased sweet response to another sweetener (Schiffman and others 2008). …”
Section: Glossary Of Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%