2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/643061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory Recovery with Innervated and Noninnervated Flaps after Total Lower Lip Reconstruction: A Comparative Study

Abstract: This study compares sensory recovery after total lower lip reconstruction in a wide variety of flaps including bilateral depressor anguli oris flap, submental island flap, bilateral fan flaps, radial forearm flap, and pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps in a large number of patients. Spontaneous return of flap sensation was documented by clinical testing in the majority (3%) of patients who underwent total lower lip reconstruction. Sensory recovery occurred more often in patients with fasciocutaneous free flap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensory recovery of the reconstructed lower extremities becomes an important issue, because a protective sensibility is imperative in preventing unintentional injuries resulting from pressure sores or burns. Although sensory recovery was extensively studied in various fields such as autologous breast reconstruction (Beugels et al, ; Santanelli, Longo, Angelini, Laporta, & Paolini, ), mammoplasty (Chiari Jr., Nunes, Grotting, Cotta, & Gomes, ), digital repair (Bulut et al, ; Lin & Chen, ), burn scars (Meirte et al, ), oral reconstruction (Boyd et al, ; Kimata et al, ), and lower lip reconstruction,(Ayhan Oral et al, ) only little is known about this issue in free flap extremity reconstruction. In addition, the reported studies were performed with different sensory test modalities and examination times, thereby making comparison invalid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The sensory recovery of the reconstructed lower extremities becomes an important issue, because a protective sensibility is imperative in preventing unintentional injuries resulting from pressure sores or burns. Although sensory recovery was extensively studied in various fields such as autologous breast reconstruction (Beugels et al, ; Santanelli, Longo, Angelini, Laporta, & Paolini, ), mammoplasty (Chiari Jr., Nunes, Grotting, Cotta, & Gomes, ), digital repair (Bulut et al, ; Lin & Chen, ), burn scars (Meirte et al, ), oral reconstruction (Boyd et al, ; Kimata et al, ), and lower lip reconstruction,(Ayhan Oral et al, ) only little is known about this issue in free flap extremity reconstruction. In addition, the reported studies were performed with different sensory test modalities and examination times, thereby making comparison invalid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are little data concerning differences between the spontaneous sensory recovery of fasciocutaneous and musculocutaneous flaps. Some authors assumed that sensory recovery was more pronounced in patients with fasciocutaneous free flaps than in musculocutaneous flaps (Ayhan Oral et al, ). However, the literature remains controversial on this point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…informaron que el grado de recuperación sensitiva fue mayor en colgajos utilizados para defectos más pequeños, probablemente debido a una reinervación espontánea a cargo de nervios residuales de la zona receptora. 19,20 Finalmente, Dykes y cols., Vriens y cols., y Close y cols., mediante biopsias incisionales en pacientes tratados con colgajos, encontraron pruebas histoquímicas significativas de regeneración de los nervios en los márgenes, a las tres semanas de la cirugía. [21][22][23] Este estudio tiene algunos factores limitantes: se trata de una serie de pacientes estudiados retrospectivamente, es una muestra acotada tratada por diferentes cirujanos y con técnicas quirúrgicas distintas, que compara un colgajo inervado con uno no inervado.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified