2013
DOI: 10.3109/02699206.2013.775346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentence comprehension in Swahili–English bilingual agrammatic speakers

Abstract: For this study, sentence comprehension was tested in Swahili-English bilingual agrammatic speakers. The sentences were controlled for four factors: (1) order of the arguments (base vs. derived); (2) embedding (declarative vs. relative sentences); (3) overt use of the relative pronoun "who"; (4) language (English and Swahili). Two theories were tested: the Trace Deletion Hypothesis (TDH; [Grodzinsky, Y. (1995). A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 50, 27-51]) that assumes a repr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study by Abuom et al syntax processing in 11 agrammatic (Broca) aphasics was studied using a sentence–picture matching test. During this test, the participant should match a verbally presented sentence to one of four pictures among which, besides the correct one, there was also a lexical distractor, a reverse role distractor and a picture that included both distractors.…”
Section: Sentence Level Information Processing In Bilingual Aphasia Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Abuom et al syntax processing in 11 agrammatic (Broca) aphasics was studied using a sentence–picture matching test. During this test, the participant should match a verbally presented sentence to one of four pictures among which, besides the correct one, there was also a lexical distractor, a reverse role distractor and a picture that included both distractors.…”
Section: Sentence Level Information Processing In Bilingual Aphasia Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that the DOP-H is a processing account: it assumes that derived order is more difficult than base order, but not that derived order is impossible, such as representational accounts like the Trace Deletion Hypothesis (e.g., Grodzinsky, 2000) suggests. The DOP-H focuses on word order in particular and is based on empirical findings across languages (for a review of the hypothesis, Abuom, Shah, & Bastiaanse, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This calls for an integrative account in line with Abuom, Shah, and Bastiaanse's (2013) who proposed that these factors are key to define the complexity of an utterance. Passive sentences are consistently found to be more impaired than actives in the languages under investigation (Bastiaanse et al, 2002;Benedet et al, 1998;Beretta et al, 2001;Gavarró & Dotti, 2014;Gavarró & Romeu, 2010;Juncos-Rabadán et al, 2009;Martínez-Ferreiro et al, 2014;Miera & Cuetos, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%