2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2018.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentence judgments and the grammar of poetry: Linking linguistic structure and poetic effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that we have not included obvious semantic or syntactic anomalies in this study. Poems (or poetic language more generally) may induce a certain tolerance towards these kinds of violations (see 13 for investigation of genre-related tolerance towards semantic and morphological anomalies in verse, and syntactic inversions, 14 ), but this is not a research question of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we have not included obvious semantic or syntactic anomalies in this study. Poems (or poetic language more generally) may induce a certain tolerance towards these kinds of violations (see 13 for investigation of genre-related tolerance towards semantic and morphological anomalies in verse, and syntactic inversions, 14 ), but this is not a research question of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contrast to Graf & Landwehr's [38] findings that some visual design features which require extra cognitive efforts support positive 'interest' effects may be explained by the difference between the aesthetic domains (spatial/visual versus temporal/language-based aesthetics). The absence of a positive effect of deviation on the 'poetic' ratings as reported by Blohm et al [27] can be attributed to the fact that, in this previous study, 'poetic' was the only rating item besides 'natural.' In this context, the word 'poetic' might have been primarily understood as a broad counterpart to a more 'natural' diction.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…By contrast, the semantic environment was very different for the raters in the present study: they had to make subtle distinctions between ratings for 'poetic' and those for 'beautiful', 'vivid,' 'praegnanz,' 'interesting,' etc. Moreover, the studies by Thierry et al [28] and Blohm et al [27] targeted only one carefully controlled deviation within the confines of short single sentences, whereas our stimuli mostly included several features of deviation and were partly full-length poems.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some investigators tried to explore the phenomenological side of reading. They have been dealing with such questions as: What are the emotional and cognitive effects of linguistic devices on readers (Blohm, Wagner, Schlesewsky, & Menninghaus, ; Carminati, Stabler, Roberts, & Fischer, ; Johansen, ; Menninghaus, Wagner, Wassiliwizky, Jacobsen, & Knoop, ; Sotirova, ; van Peer, Hakemulder, & Zyngier, )? How do the subjective dimensions of literary interpretation (Nenadić, Vejnović, & Marković, ; Vernay, ) and evaluation (Knoop, Wagner, Jacobsen, & Menninghaus, ) come to existence?…”
Section: Contemporary Debatementioning
confidence: 99%