2019 4th International Conference on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icitisee48480.2019.9003903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentiment Analysis in Airline Tweets Using Mutual Information for Feature Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During text analysis, slang words bring unsuitable implications. We apply the synonym method at this step to replace slang with its standard equivalent word ( Utama, 2019 ). We do this by comparing the words in the dataset to the slang word list and synonyms and finding matches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During text analysis, slang words bring unsuitable implications. We apply the synonym method at this step to replace slang with its standard equivalent word ( Utama, 2019 ). We do this by comparing the words in the dataset to the slang word list and synonyms and finding matches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our rationale behind using the method is to see how effectively the words sought to be associated with certain sentiment classes (PMI measures) can serve as features in training the sentiment classifier model. A number of studies use the PMI-based approach to sentiment analysis ( Bindal & Chatterjee, 2016 ; Vo & Ock, 2012 ; Feldman, 2013 ; Hamdan, Bellot & Bechet, 2015 ; Utama, 2019 ; Bonzanini, 2016 ; Kanna & Pandiaraja, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x A 0 j = {0.9770, 0.9719, 0.9513, 0.9597, 0.9770, 0.9770, 0.9766, 2.0112, 0.9646} After the normalization of the matrix X is obtained, the next step is to perform the weighted normalization by multiplying the criteria weight by the normalized weighted matrix according to the formula (16). The results of weighted normalization are presented in detail in Table 6.…”
Section: Evaluation Feature Selection Methods Using Arasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model achieved 97.1% accuracy compared to 92.0% on the comparison model. Next, Utama [16] performed feature selection using the mutual information (MI) model to predict the airline's tweet sentiment analysis. The feature selection made contributions to the classifier improvement.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e grid search method with 10-fold CV has been used to find the machine learning algorithms' optimal hyperparameters and enhance the accuracy. Four machine learning classification algorithms, logistic regression (LR) [39], decision tree (DT) [40], random forest classifier (RF) [41,42], and support vector machine [43], are used in this work. e accuracy of cross-validation and unseen data is calculated for each model.…”
Section: Classifiers' Optimization and Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%