2017
DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2017.52b006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentinel-1 Radar Data Assessment to Estimate Crop Water Stress

Abstract: Water is an important component in agricultural production for both yield quantity and quality. Although all weather conditions are driving factors in the agricultural sector, the precipitation in rainfed agriculture is the most limiting weather parameter. Water deficit may occur continuously over the total growing period or during any particular growth stage of the crop. Optical remote sensing is very useful but, in cloudy days it becomes useless. Radar penetrates the cloud and collects information through th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are aware that both soil moisture and the SAR backscatter are influenced by more factors than addressed in our study. For instance, the soil surface roughness was not considered, although it is reported a major limiting factor for active microwave soil moisture RS (e.g., Sahebi et al, 2002;Schuler et al, 2002;Walker et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2016;El-Shirbeny and Abutaleb, 2017). As no tillage and storm events, commonly known to largely influence the backscatter (e.g., Baghdadi et al, 2008;Dalla Rosa et al, 2012), were notice and recorded, respectively, during our short observation period (i.e., 18 days), we assumed that the surface roughness did not vary and ignored it, particularly as its field survey was considered not feasible.…”
Section: Transferability and Constraints Of The Modeling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We are aware that both soil moisture and the SAR backscatter are influenced by more factors than addressed in our study. For instance, the soil surface roughness was not considered, although it is reported a major limiting factor for active microwave soil moisture RS (e.g., Sahebi et al, 2002;Schuler et al, 2002;Walker et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2016;El-Shirbeny and Abutaleb, 2017). As no tillage and storm events, commonly known to largely influence the backscatter (e.g., Baghdadi et al, 2008;Dalla Rosa et al, 2012), were notice and recorded, respectively, during our short observation period (i.e., 18 days), we assumed that the surface roughness did not vary and ignored it, particularly as its field survey was considered not feasible.…”
Section: Transferability and Constraints Of The Modeling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML approaches are increasingly used to estimate θ in agricultural watersheds across humid to arid climate regimes and at different scales (e.g., Quesney et al, 2000;Hachani et al, 2019). They are reported to improve hydrological modeling in wetlands (Dabrowska-Zielinska et al, 2018) and to support the monitoring of water tables dynamics (Asmuß et al, 2019), and the estimation of crop water stress (El-Shirbeny and Abutaleb, 2017), and the water use efficiency (Efremova et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the lack of benchmarks and various metrics makes it difficult to compare performance. Various optical and radar-based data from Landsat 7, Landsat 8, Sentinel-1, and Planet have been analysed for yield forecasts [1,2]. The combined use of data from Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 improves the temporal resolution for 2016, before Sentinel-2B was launched.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relation between radar and optical/thermal data can be significant for better understanding and managing wetlands. Several studies have investigated the relation between different satellite data in different land covers [16]. However, the relation between SAR values and land surface temperature values within a wetland area has not been a subject of a delicate investigation.…”
Section: A Short Review On Remote Sensing For Wetland Mapping and Monmentioning
confidence: 99%