2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentinel lymph node biopsy examination for breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further investigations are required. [23][24][25][26] We conducted this study to determine suitable criteria for the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases, in terms of node size, using mammary CT, the objective being to have criteria that are easy to understand and can be employed at any institution. Our results suggest that the most suitable criterion is to consider an axillary lymph node to be node-positive if it is greater than 5 mm in short-axis diameter, and the accuracy of this criterion was found to be favorable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further investigations are required. [23][24][25][26] We conducted this study to determine suitable criteria for the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases, in terms of node size, using mammary CT, the objective being to have criteria that are easy to understand and can be employed at any institution. Our results suggest that the most suitable criterion is to consider an axillary lymph node to be node-positive if it is greater than 5 mm in short-axis diameter, and the accuracy of this criterion was found to be favorable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no difference in identification of sentinel lymph node according to age. Studies by Shen et al 7 and Kinoshita et al 8 included average age of 49 and 51.1 years respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion criteria were as follows: i) Female patients with operable breast cancer (invasive carcinoma and/or ductal carcinoma in situ); ii) age, ≥18 and ≤85 years; iii) scheduled for mastectomy either alone or in association with axillary clearance; iv) either sentinel lymph node biopsy or standard level I/II axillary node dissection (14); v) written hospital-approved informed consent by the patient; and vi) surgical wound classified class I (Surgical Wound Classification) (15). Patients were excluded if any of the following criteria were met: i) Undergoing surgery for modified radical mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction, cosmetic breast operations, reduction, expansion, insertion of a prosthesis, duct ectasia, infective breast disease or implant; ii) surgical wounds identified as class II, III or IV using Centers for Disease Control surgical site infection Surgical Wound Classification (15); iii) inflammatory breast cancer or skin ulceration; iv) presence of physical or psychiatric conditions that could impair outcome assessment and intended follow-up (5); v) personal or family skin scar history; vi) received an experimental drug or used an experimental medical device within 30 days prior to the planned start of treatment; vii) employees of the assessor associated with the proposed study or other studies under the direction of that assessor; and viii) unlikely to comply with chemotherapy or complete the 25-week follow-up visit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%