2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentinel lymph node mapping and intraoperative assessment in a prospective, international, multicentre, observational trial of patients with cervical cancer: The SENTIX trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SENTIREC CERVIX study is, to our knowledge, the first prospective national study to investigate the accuracy of SLN mapping in a large homogeneous sample of women with early-stage cervical cancer and tumor size >20 mm on final pathology. Earlier studies have reported on mixed samples with different risk profiles regarding tumor size [6,8,[25][26][27]. Increasing tumor diameter is known to be associated with poorer prognosis [2,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SENTIREC CERVIX study is, to our knowledge, the first prospective national study to investigate the accuracy of SLN mapping in a large homogeneous sample of women with early-stage cervical cancer and tumor size >20 mm on final pathology. Earlier studies have reported on mixed samples with different risk profiles regarding tumor size [6,8,[25][26][27]. Increasing tumor diameter is known to be associated with poorer prognosis [2,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the SENTICOL 2 trial excluded women with unilateral SLN mapping from their survival analyses due to a previously shown higher risk of false-negative SLNs in failed mapping. The same approach was used in the prospective SENTIX study [27]. In our study, no women were excluded due to unilateral mapping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the surgery, patients were registered if they met additional intraoperative criteria: bilateral SLN detection, no metastasis of any size found on frozen sections, and no evidence of more advanced disease ( Figure 1 ). All retrieved sentinel lymph nodes were consequently processed by ultrastaging protocol, as described elsewhere [ 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main motive for introducing sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy as a replacement of standard systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) is to decrease postoperative morbidity, specifically the development of LLL. Since the average number of SLN among cervical cancer patients is between 2–4 and removal of SLN does not usually require a complete dissection of pelvic spaces and interruption of all main lymphatic trunks, substantial reduction of LLL is expected after SLN biopsy without systematic PLND [ 24 , 25 , 26 ]. Implementation of SLN biopsy was already shown to be an effective strategy in reducing the incidence of LLL after treatment of endometrial or vulvar cancer [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique has been proposed with promising results in terms of sensitivity in diagnosing lymph node metastasis [ 8 , 9 ]. Nevertheless, even though the ultrastaging of SLN at final pathology increases its negative predictive value by diagnosing low-volume metastases, different studies questioned the role of frozen section of SLN, with sensitivity ranging from 46.0%to 87.5% [10] , [11] , [12] . For this reason, the use of a frozen section of SLN may not be the best tool to triage patients to radical hysterectomy versus definitive chemoradiation [12] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%