2018
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.98.012315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separability-entanglement classifier via machine learning

Abstract: The problem of determining whether a given quantum state is entangled lies at the heart of quantum information processing, which is known to be an NP-hard problem in general. Despite the proposed many methods such as the positive partial transpose (PPT) criterion and the k-symmetric extendibility criterion to tackle this problem in practice, none of them enables a general, effective solution to the problem even for small dimensions. Explicitly, separable states form a high-dimensional convex set, which exhibit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the mathematical model, the qubit always returns a binary decision regardless of the number of reservoirs acting as the input information channels as implied in Eqs. (5) and (6). Though generalizing the proposal to larger number of input channels are straightforward due to the additivity of the quantum dynamical maps and the convexity of the density matrix, nevertheless, we give an example for three reservoir states as input information channels for further analysis as depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Three Input Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the mathematical model, the qubit always returns a binary decision regardless of the number of reservoirs acting as the input information channels as implied in Eqs. (5) and (6). Though generalizing the proposal to larger number of input channels are straightforward due to the additivity of the quantum dynamical maps and the convexity of the density matrix, nevertheless, we give an example for three reservoir states as input information channels for further analysis as depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Three Input Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification of data is of central importance to important implementations such as medical diagnosis, pattern recognition and machine learning. Due to the well-known advantages of quantum computation, studies about the quantum equivalent of machine learning algorithms have been reached to a remarkable level [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. In contrast to the circuit model of quantum computation in which the system of interest is assumed to be perfectly isolated from the environmental degrees of freedom, one could imagine a quantum classifier as an open quantum system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we can see, most of the threshold values are improved by Proposition 1, but few are not. Recently in [27], by using machine learning techniques, the threshold for state ρ UPB is reported to be 0.8649. However, a huge number of random extreme points within the separable region is needed by the method in Ref.…”
Section: Appendix C: Applications Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a huge number of random extreme points within the separable region is needed by the method in Ref. [27], which is only useful for the particular state tested.…”
Section: Appendix C: Applications Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, machine learning (ML) is designed to discover hidden data correlations, and it is widely used in classification problems [23]. It has been recently introduced in quantum information tasks to mitigate crosstalks in multi-qubit readout [24], to enhance quantum metrology [25,26], to identify quantum phases of matter and phase transitions [27][28][29], to identify entanglement [30][31][32], and even to determine existence of quantum advantage [33], to name a few. In particular, ML shows success in efficient interpretation of quantum state tomography (QST), by being robust to partial QST and state-preparation-and-measurement (SPAM) errors [32,[34][35][36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%