2009
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separate and Combined Effects of Visual Schedules and Extinction Plus Differential Reinforcement on Problem Behavior Occasioned by Transitions

Abstract: The separate and combined effects of visual schedules and extinction plus differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO) were evaluated to decrease transition-related problem behavior of 2 children diagnosed with autism. Visual schedules alone were ineffective in reducing problem behavior when transitioning from preferred to nonpreferred activities. Problem behavior decreased for both participants when extinction and DRO were introduced, regardless of whether visual schedules were also used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it is also possible that the signalling strategy would be effective only for lower level challenging behaviours in these participants. Supporting this possibility, an important interaction between resistance to change and the occurrence of a preferred event has been demonstrated in previous research examining the efficacy of intervention approaches aiming to increase environmental predictability (Waters, Lerman & Hovanetz, 2009). Further research evaluating the present signalling strategy, which tracks occurrence of changes to expectations during baseline and evaluation periods (whatever the result of those changes), will be important to distinguish between these possibilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…On the other hand, it is also possible that the signalling strategy would be effective only for lower level challenging behaviours in these participants. Supporting this possibility, an important interaction between resistance to change and the occurrence of a preferred event has been demonstrated in previous research examining the efficacy of intervention approaches aiming to increase environmental predictability (Waters, Lerman & Hovanetz, 2009). Further research evaluating the present signalling strategy, which tracks occurrence of changes to expectations during baseline and evaluation periods (whatever the result of those changes), will be important to distinguish between these possibilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Although advance notice procedures are widely considered to be effective (e.g., Banda and Grimmett 2008;Lequia et al 2012;Koyama and Wang 2011;Sterling-Turner and Jordan 2007), discrepant findings regarding the effectiveness of advance notice have been reported (Cote et al 2005;McCord et al 2001;Wilder et al 2006;Waters et al 2009;Wilder et al 2010;Wilder et al 2007). Some researchers have speculated that these negative results indicate that advance notice procedures are ineffective (Wilder et al 2010).…”
Section: Advance Noticementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a different form of advance notice, Waters et al (2009) assessed the effects of visual schedules on the problem behaviors of two children with autism in a classroom setting. The authors used a similar FA methodology as McCord et al (2001) for assessing transition-related problem behavior.…”
Section: Negative Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the limited implementation of functional assessments in the current review, it seems that challenging behavior during transitions functions to escape a demand context (e.g., Davis et al 1998) or to gain access to a previous set of stimulus conditions (e.g., Waters et al 2009). Similarly, the antecedent conditions that may occasion problem behavior during transitions may be the onset of those conditions (e.g., teacher walking to student with a worksheet).…”
Section: Functional Behavior Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…participant, sess. Five studies addressed challenging behavior in the context of transitions using consequence-based strategies (Kern and Vorndran 2000;McCord et al 2001;Repp and Karsh 1994;Waters et al 2009). For example, McCord et al (2001) implemented a treatment package that consisted of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior, extinction, and response blocking to decrease the self-injurious behavior (SIB) of two adults with profound intellectual disability admitted to a residential treatment center.…”
Section: Antecedent-based Strategies For Challenging Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%