1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-8641(98)00076-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separate versus joint continuity: A tale of four topologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In what follows, we endow the product space Aut Leb (M ) × L ∞ (M, SL(d, R)) with the separate topology in W ×L ∞ . For full details on the issue of continuity of multivariable real maps, see [11].…”
Section: Trivial and Simple Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows, we endow the product space Aut Leb (M ) × L ∞ (M, SL(d, R)) with the separate topology in W ×L ∞ . For full details on the issue of continuity of multivariable real maps, see [11].…”
Section: Trivial and Simple Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This topology is sometimes called the cross topology [16]. Let X ⊗ Y be the set-theoretic product with the weak topology with respect to the projection fibers …”
Section: Remark 43mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Answering Problem C, p. 203 of [11], the first-named author [22] refines Brown's techniques ("two-dimensional" example) by constructing a separately continuous real-valued function f defined on the Cartesian product of two complete metric spaces X, Y such that the (in fact, dense G δ ) set C(f ) of points of (joint) continuity fails to contain either A × Y or X × B for any dense G δ -set A in X or any dense G δ set B in Y . In other words, the condition of the theorem for Namioka spaces fails "in both directions".…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%