2007
DOI: 10.1093/ijrl/eem053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separated Children: A Comparison of the Treatment of Separated Child Refugees Entering Australia and Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the option is still available as a matter of last resort, and is utilized at the off-shore detention facility in Christmas Island. Current detainees include children aged from 0-17 years (Briskman et al, 2010;Martin and Curran, 2007).…”
Section: Emotional Health and Wellbeingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the option is still available as a matter of last resort, and is utilized at the off-shore detention facility in Christmas Island. Current detainees include children aged from 0-17 years (Briskman et al, 2010;Martin and Curran, 2007).…”
Section: Emotional Health and Wellbeingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a lack of consensus on a singular definition of an unaccompanied minor, resulting in confusion on what exactly is meant by the term and other related terms. Scholars and government bodies offer and follow varied articulations of the definition of unaccompanied minor (Ali, 2006;Canada Border Services Agency [CBSA], 2017; Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, n.d.; Luke, 2007;Martin & Curran, 2007;Rousseau, 2001;UNHCR, 1997;Wouk et al, 2006). Separated minors are sometimes distinguished from truly unaccompanied minors under the umbrella term of unaccompanied minors both legally and academically.…”
Section: Defining and Contextualizing Unaccompanied Minorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that the treatment of children in terms of detainment varies significantly around the world. Martin & Curran (2007) compare the past treatment practices of unaccompanied children in Canada and Australia. Compared to Australia, the treatment of unaccompanied children in detention facilities outlined in Ali's (2006) study is quite tame.…”
Section: Impact Of Children As a Vulnerable Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to Australia, the treatment of unaccompanied children in detention facilities outlined in Ali's (2006) study is quite tame. Prior to 2005, Australia instituted mandatory detention for all unaccompanied children, which resulted in 5,139 children being detained from 1999 to 2002 (Martin & Curran, 2007). Australia has enacted more stringent detention policies than Canada for the vulnerable immigrant populations it receives; however, the researchers argue more can be done from both states to help protect immigrant children under the law (Martin & Curran, 2007).…”
Section: Impact Of Children As a Vulnerable Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%