2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2017.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separated monic representations I: Gorenstein-projective modules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let X i and (P i , Q i , α i , β i , g i ) be given as in (8) and (9). en, f i : X i ⟶ X i+1 is a Λ-map if and only if f i is given in (10).…”
Section: Complete Projective Resolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let X i and (P i , Q i , α i , β i , g i ) be given as in (8) and (9). en, f i : X i ⟶ X i+1 is a Λ-map if and only if f i is given in (10).…”
Section: Complete Projective Resolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. First, assume that f i : X i ⟶ X i+1 is a Λ-map, where f i is given in (10). Since the diagram…”
Section: Complete Projective Resolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) Using (1) and the fact that smon(Q, I, A) is a resolving subcategory of Λ-mod (see [LZ,Thm. 3.1]), the assertion can be easily proved: the argument is as follows.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also Ringel and Schmidmeier have studied their Auslander-Reiten theory [22], as well as some particular cases of wild type [23]. Moreover they were studied with respect to Gorenstein-projective modules and tilting theory in [20,30]. The homological properties of submodule categories give extensive information on quiver Grassmannians, in particular their isomorphism classes correspond to strata in certain stratifications [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%