2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9204311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separated Phase–Current Controls Using Inverter-Based DGs to Mitigate Effects of Fault Current Contribution from Synchronous DGs on Recloser–Fuse

Abstract: Synchronous distributed generators (SDGs) significantly affect recloser–fuse coordination due to the high fault current contribution. This paper proposes a separated phase–current control using inverter-based distributed generators (IBDGs) to remove the effects of fault current contributions from SDGs during unsymmetrical faults. The three-phase current produced by IBDGs is independently controlled. While the total fault current is reduced by adjusting the current phase angle in the faulty phase, the energy in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The case studies have been designed for three different locations of the DG in the network (bus/nodes 633, 646, and 652) and different levels of DG power penetration, specifically 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%. The different case studies have been simulated with DIgSILENT © software from Power Factory [15], as this power system simulation software has a specific library for electrical protection. The locations of the DG in the distribution network are included in Table 1, the distance to the substation being also included in each case.…”
Section: Distrtibution Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The case studies have been designed for three different locations of the DG in the network (bus/nodes 633, 646, and 652) and different levels of DG power penetration, specifically 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%. The different case studies have been simulated with DIgSILENT © software from Power Factory [15], as this power system simulation software has a specific library for electrical protection. The locations of the DG in the distribution network are included in Table 1, the distance to the substation being also included in each case.…”
Section: Distrtibution Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chaitusaney and Yokoyama have studied in detail the impact of the DG on the system stability, considering the lack of coordination between protection devices [14]. Finally, Boonyapakdee et al analyzed the dynamic coordination of recloser fuses affected by synchronous distributed generators [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a safety margin is imposed to enhance the accuracy of the disturbance direction identification. The practical criterion is formulated as Equation (10).…”
Section: Set the Rules For Disturbance Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, it is experimentally set as 0.01. Equation (10) ensures that those unclear disturbance conditions with Dir laying in a small vicinity of zero, will be ignored. Such conditions could be simultaneous disturbances on both grid and load side, or those with slight voltage and current fluctuations.…”
Section: Set the Rules For Disturbance Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation