2020
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00536.2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separating neural influences from peripheral mechanics: the speed-curvature relation in mechanically constrained actions

Abstract: Physically interacting with kinematic constraints is commonplace in everyday actions. We report a study of humans turning a crank, a circular constraint that imposes constant hand path curvature and hence should suppress variations of hand speed due to the power-law speed-curvature relation widely reported for unconstrained motions. Remarkably, we found that, when peripheral biomechanical factors are removed, a speed-curvature relation reemerges, indicating that it is, at least in part, of neural origin.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shapes are approximately elliptical and show consistent speed fluctuations along the ellipse. Previous work showed that speed minima coincide with curvature maxima [10]. In addition, the elliptic shapes clearly show a difference in orientation between the two directions.…”
Section: A Covariance Ellipse Orientationmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The shapes are approximately elliptical and show consistent speed fluctuations along the ellipse. Previous work showed that speed minima coincide with curvature maxima [10]. In addition, the elliptic shapes clearly show a difference in orientation between the two directions.…”
Section: A Covariance Ellipse Orientationmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In a previous paper, we presented the method applied in this work [10]. The approach assumes a plausible mathematical model of interactive dynamics and used it to 'subtract off' or 'peel back' peripheral biomechanics to uncover a summary of the underlying neural influences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impedance is a proxy for mechanical or spinal reflex mechanisms with short latencies between 25 to 80 ms [ 86 , 87 ]. In contrast to explicit error corrections in a biological system that involves transcortical sensorimotor loop delays >100 ms, impedance-based corrections are regarded as compensations around a planned sinusoidal zero-force trajectory that are either spinally mediated or that arise from intrinsic muscle mechanics [ 88 , 89 ]. While the constant impedance values assumed in this task are likely to be an oversimplification of the biological system, reliable estimates from real human movements are still missing [ 90 , 91 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As long as the impedance operator is invertible, given measured actual position ( ) and force ( ), the zero-force trajectory can always be identified at any time [Hermus et al, 2020]. The mere existence of the zero-force trajectory 0 , under the assumption that the inverse of the impedance operator exists, is not by itself very surprising.…”
Section: Mechanical Impedancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, based on the Norton equivalent network formulation, the behavior at an interaction port of an arbitrarily complex system can be completely summarized in a simpler form which is functionally equivalent. The other benefit is that the elements comprising the network model are experimentally identifiable (at least in principle) [Hodgson andHogan, 2000, Hermus et al, 2020]. Based on this simplified model, the two parts of the model, the equivalent motion source and equivalent impedance, can be identified from experiments in situ.…”
Section: Norton Equivalent Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%