1977
DOI: 10.2514/3.60658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation ahead of Protuberances in Supersonic Turbulent Boundary Layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7h, these large oscillations are particularly restricted to the region close to the corner, where a secondary vortex is expected. While the flow organisation may vary significantly across different (Sedney 1973;Sedney and Kitchens 1977;Ozcan and Holt 1984), results suggest that the organisation is dominated by the main horseshoe vortex and the localised counter-rotating vortex at the corner for the present range of interactions (0.17 × 10 5 < Re δ u < 0.47 × 10 5 ). The proximity of the present conditions to the Re δ u ≈ 1 × 10 5 threshold-which is often regarded as an approximate limit for Reynolds number trend reversal in separation length correlations (Délery and Marvin 1986)-places the present interactions within a relatively complex regime whereby both viscous and inviscid forces play a significant role.…”
Section: Time-dependent Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…7h, these large oscillations are particularly restricted to the region close to the corner, where a secondary vortex is expected. While the flow organisation may vary significantly across different (Sedney 1973;Sedney and Kitchens 1977;Ozcan and Holt 1984), results suggest that the organisation is dominated by the main horseshoe vortex and the localised counter-rotating vortex at the corner for the present range of interactions (0.17 × 10 5 < Re δ u < 0.47 × 10 5 ). The proximity of the present conditions to the Re δ u ≈ 1 × 10 5 threshold-which is often regarded as an approximate limit for Reynolds number trend reversal in separation length correlations (Délery and Marvin 1986)-places the present interactions within a relatively complex regime whereby both viscous and inviscid forces play a significant role.…”
Section: Time-dependent Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For better understanding each chord plane is advancing in the upward Y-direction of the domain. The flow separation from the fin surface can be compared to that of a flow separation from the blunt surface with height to width ratio of ~ 0.13 [4]. The current single planar fin case has a height to width ratio of ~ 0.11.…”
Section: Computed Shock Structures and Surface Pressuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hung and Buning [2], Hung and Kordullat [3] initially carried out simulations on a 3-D flat plate, in turbulent flow. Sedney and Kitchens [4] conducted experiments in supersonic regime involving spherical protuberances, the flow separation can be co-related to flow over blunt surfaces. In this study the detailed pressure and Mach number contours were presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the split operator contains the spatial flux derivatives in only one direction. The finite difference formulation in terms of the split operators can be expressed as (4) Each split operator consists of a predictor and a corrector step. During a specific numerical sweep, the inviscid fluxes are forward differenced in the prediction sequence and backward differenced in the correction step.…”
Section: Computational Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%