2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation and characterization of gold nanoparticle mixtures by flow-field-flow fractionation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparatively large value reported for NM-300 by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis System can be related to the limit of detection of the method, which is not reliable for nanoparticles typically below 30-50 nm depending on the NPs optical properties [27][28][29]. Results obtained for NM-300 size distribution by DLS were comparable with those previously observed [30] and indicate a polydispersity of the sample, and therefore an unreliable value of the size measured by DLS [31]. These results were complemented by TEM size distribution analysis and CPS, which indicate both an average diameter of 15-17 nm (see supplementary information).…”
Section: Ag Nps Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The comparatively large value reported for NM-300 by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis System can be related to the limit of detection of the method, which is not reliable for nanoparticles typically below 30-50 nm depending on the NPs optical properties [27][28][29]. Results obtained for NM-300 size distribution by DLS were comparable with those previously observed [30] and indicate a polydispersity of the sample, and therefore an unreliable value of the size measured by DLS [31]. These results were complemented by TEM size distribution analysis and CPS, which indicate both an average diameter of 15-17 nm (see supplementary information).…”
Section: Ag Nps Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…All these methods have limitations; SEM because the amount of particles measured is limited; DLS is more sensitive to bigger particles, while the sensitivity of disc centrifuging is very much density dependant. However, the agreement of the three methods allows us to discard aggregation, or the existence of smaller species masked by larger ones, a typical phenomena occurring with DLS measurements 14 . Therefore, by using three complementary techniques we carefully characterized the AuNPs according to size, which is critical for the interpretation of results obtained using cellular interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small gold nanospheres had a very regular shape (Fig. 1), narrow size distribution (2r = 15.6 ± 1.6 nm), and narrow absorption peak (518 nm), while the gold nanoflowers were of irregular shape, larger size, and highly polydisperse (40-120 nm), with an absorption well extended into the NIR region [48,49]. Big regularly shaped gold nanospheres with a hydrodynamic diameter of 86 nm were employed to identify effects that are caused by large particle size.…”
Section: Characterization Of Gold Nanospheres and Gold Nanoflowersmentioning
confidence: 99%